Title : Amazon's patent was called "an extraordinary illustration of worker alienation, a stark moment in the relationship between humans and machines."
link : Amazon's patent was called "an extraordinary illustration of worker alienation, a stark moment in the relationship between humans and machines."
Amazon's patent was called "an extraordinary illustration of worker alienation, a stark moment in the relationship between humans and machines."
"Amazon says it never implemented the technology and has no plans to, but the design appeared to be an effort to allow humans to safely enter robot-only zones in Amazon’s highly-automated depots to make repairs or pick up dropped objects. In an Amazon facility in Kent, for example, 750-pound robots topped with shelves scoot around an area surrounded by high chain-link fences, bringing merchandise like iPhone cases and coffee mugs to waiting employees who place or retrieve items from windows built into the fence. If an unauthorized human strays into the robot-only zone, the company says, an alarm is triggered and the devices are designed to shut down to avoid colliding with the person. Amazon, in its patent, suggested a way around that firm boundary between human and robot territory...."From "Amazon has patented a system that would put workers in a cage, on top of a robot" (The Seattle Times).
The idea of a human being in a cage on top of a robot seems to distress people more than the total exclusion of humans from "robot-only zones." The "cage" is a protective enclosure around the person, so it's like a helmet or a car, but we have a special sensitivity about the openness of a metal enclosure....
Why the sensitivity? If the shell around the person were solid metal or plastic and metal (like a car) would it seem very different? Perhaps yes, because we couldn't say "cage." Why does the openness seem more offensively confining? It must be the association with animals. It's not that animals are treated worse by putting them in containers that are as open-air as possible. It's the best way to confine them, maximizing ventilation and light. We're offended when something associated with animals is used on a human being. Thus, a more confining shell to protect the Amazon worker in the robot zone would probably leave most of us untroubled.
It reminds me of the objections to a harness and leash for a toddler. It would let him roam around a bit and explore and get some exercise, but who dares to use this method of protecting and keeping control of a little child? So perfectly healthy and ambulatory kids are strapped into strollers and wheeled about like invalids. Their exercise — when they are not sleeping or groggily inert — is squirming.
Thus articles Amazon's patent was called "an extraordinary illustration of worker alienation, a stark moment in the relationship between humans and machines."
that is all articles Amazon's patent was called "an extraordinary illustration of worker alienation, a stark moment in the relationship between humans and machines." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Amazon's patent was called "an extraordinary illustration of worker alienation, a stark moment in the relationship between humans and machines." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2018/09/amazons-patent-was-called-extraordinary.html
0 Response to "Amazon's patent was called "an extraordinary illustration of worker alienation, a stark moment in the relationship between humans and machines.""
Post a Comment