"But nothing Rowling has said qualifies as transphobic. She is not disputing the existence of gender dysphoria." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "But nothing Rowling has said qualifies as transphobic. She is not disputing the existence of gender dysphoria.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "But nothing Rowling has said qualifies as transphobic. She is not disputing the existence of gender dysphoria."
link : "But nothing Rowling has said qualifies as transphobic. She is not disputing the existence of gender dysphoria."

"But nothing Rowling has said qualifies as transphobic. She is not disputing the existence of gender dysphoria."

"She has never voiced opposition to allowing people to transition under evidence-based therapeutic and medical care. She is not denying transgender people equal pay or housing. There is no evidence that she is putting trans people 'in danger,' as has been claimed, nor is she denying their right to exist. Take it from one of her former critics. E.J. Rosetta, a journalist who once denounced Rowling for her supposed transphobia, was commissioned last year to write an article called '20 Transphobic J.K. Rowling Quotes We’re Done With.' After 12 weeks of reporting and reading, Rosetta wrote, 'I’ve not found a single truly transphobic message.' On Twitter she declared, 'You’re burning the wrong witch.'"

Writes Pamela Paul in "In Defense of J.K. Rowling" (NYT).

If my name were Rosetta, my go-to metaphor for persecution wouldn't be witch-burning. It would be stoning. But "witch" is apt because there's a new podcast, "The Witch Trials of J.K. Rowling."

We'll hear Rowling herself, and she will be interviewed by Megan Phelps-Roper, who used to be part of the Westboro Baptist Church and was "taught to believe Rowling was going to hell over her support for gay rights."  

According to Phelps-Roper, Rowling is "looking around and realizing that other people are self-censoring because they cannot afford to speak up. But she felt she had to be honest and stand up against a movement that she saw as using authoritarian tactics."

As Rowling herself notes on the podcast, she’s written books where “from the very first page, bullying and authoritarian behavior is held to be one of the worst of human ills.” 

Those who accuse Rowling of punching down against her critics ignore the fact that she is sticking up for those who have silenced themselves to avoid the job loss, public vilification and threats to physical safety that other critics of recent gender orthodoxies have suffered. Social media is then leveraged to amplify those attacks. 

It’s a strategy Phelps-Roper recognizes from her days at Westboro. “We leaned into whatever would get us the most attention, and that was often the most outrageous and aggressive versions of what we believed,” she recalled....  

Thus articles "But nothing Rowling has said qualifies as transphobic. She is not disputing the existence of gender dysphoria."

that is all articles "But nothing Rowling has said qualifies as transphobic. She is not disputing the existence of gender dysphoria." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "But nothing Rowling has said qualifies as transphobic. She is not disputing the existence of gender dysphoria." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2023/02/but-nothing-rowling-has-said-qualifies.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: