"Sam literally said to me, ‘The only people I think I’d wear long pants for are Congress.'" - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "Sam literally said to me, ‘The only people I think I’d wear long pants for are Congress.'", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "Sam literally said to me, ‘The only people I think I’d wear long pants for are Congress.'"
link : "Sam literally said to me, ‘The only people I think I’d wear long pants for are Congress.'"

"Sam literally said to me, ‘The only people I think I’d wear long pants for are Congress.'"

Said Andy Croghan — a colleague of Sam Bankman-Fried's — quoted in a May 2022 NYT article, "A Crypto Emperor’s Vision: No Pants, His Rules/Sam Bankman-Fried is a studiously disheveled billionaire who made a fortune overseeing trades that are too risky for the U.S. market. Now he wants Washington to follow his lead" (NYT).

Croghan was trying to get SBF to look more conventionally presentable. He says he said, "Sam, you’ve got to cut your hair, dude — it looks ridiculous." SBF retorted: "I honestly think it’s negative EV for me to cut my hair. I think it’s important for people to think I look crazy." 

When SBF did testify before Congress, he wore long pants and was more subtly weird by doing his shoe laces like this:

 

That article from last May is by David Yaffe-Bellany, who was on yesterday's episode of the NYT Daily podcast, which I highly recommend. Yaffe-Bellany talks about how SBF tried "to create a mystique for himself as a kind of nerd genius," affecting a "disheveled appearance" that was "all very calculated." Don't miss the voice of Bill Clinton at 16:20.

"It’s negative EV for me to cut my hair" — What's "EV"? From the May article:

Before making any kind of business decision, Mr. Bankman-Fried weighs the options in quantitative terms. “What’s the expected value?” he often asks co-workers, before assigning numbers to each possible outcome: A good result has positive EV; a bad one, negative EV. Once, while a few colleagues were cracking crypto-themed sex jokes in the office, he whirled around in his chair. Was there positive EV, he wondered, in distributing condoms with jokes on them at an upcoming conference? (The answer was yes: “Never breaks,” one of the FTX-branded wrappers read, “even during large liquidations.”)

ADDED: In the comments to yesterday's post John Borell — obviously aware of my longstanding critique of men in shorts — wrote "all SBF posts should have a 'men in shorts' tag." 

I responded:

He owned his personal style and it was a good message if people knew how to understand it. Which they didn't. Because they were listening to their own (greedy) hopes 'n' dreams.

Let them now enjoy their own stupid genius-god in short pants. I think it's very funny.

Thus articles "Sam literally said to me, ‘The only people I think I’d wear long pants for are Congress.'"

that is all articles "Sam literally said to me, ‘The only people I think I’d wear long pants for are Congress.'" This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "Sam literally said to me, ‘The only people I think I’d wear long pants for are Congress.'" with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2022/11/sam-literally-said-to-me-only-people-i.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: