Title : Judges ought to write in a way that "ordinary citizens can understand" because it "constrains the power of politicians or talking heads to shape or warp the narrative."
link : Judges ought to write in a way that "ordinary citizens can understand" because it "constrains the power of politicians or talking heads to shape or warp the narrative."
Judges ought to write in a way that "ordinary citizens can understand" because it "constrains the power of politicians or talking heads to shape or warp the narrative."
Said Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee on the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, quoted in a Reuters article with, ironically, a headline that's hard to understand, "'Judges gone wild': Trump-appointed judge says too many write for Twitter."
I thought, from that headline, that some judges were actually posting on Twitter and going wild there!
But Bibas was talking about opinion-writing. He objected to...
... filling [opinions] with distracting jargon, bad jokes and pop culture references, such as Star Wars in one case, rather than delivering "clear and succinct" rulings.
"For the show off, it seems to be all about the judge's musings, even the judge's ambitions to be noticed," Bibas said. "'Look at me, look at me, I'm so cool.' That is not authoritative. It is even disrespectful."
Asked by a student how judges feel when a big ruling like his election decisions garners them "newfound fame"....
I wonder if the student used the word "garner."
... Bibas said "the kind of cheerleading you get from Twitter is really dangerous," yet some judges seem to seek that attention.
"Try to be on Twitter less than you otherwise would," he said. "Try not to be searching for the feedback or the plaudits or anything else. Just focus on the craft and find as much internal satisfaction in the craft of judging and writing as you can."
Thus articles Judges ought to write in a way that "ordinary citizens can understand" because it "constrains the power of politicians or talking heads to shape or warp the narrative."
You now read the article Judges ought to write in a way that "ordinary citizens can understand" because it "constrains the power of politicians or talking heads to shape or warp the narrative." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2022/11/judges-ought-to-write-in-way-that.html
0 Response to "Judges ought to write in a way that "ordinary citizens can understand" because it "constrains the power of politicians or talking heads to shape or warp the narrative.""
Post a Comment