Title : "And though sex differences in sports show advantages for men, researchers today still don’t know how much of this to attribute to biological difference..."
link : "And though sex differences in sports show advantages for men, researchers today still don’t know how much of this to attribute to biological difference..."
"And though sex differences in sports show advantages for men, researchers today still don’t know how much of this to attribute to biological difference..."
"... versus the lack of support provided to women athletes to reach their highest potential. 'Science is increasingly showing how sex is dynamic; it has multiple aspects and also shifts; for example, social experiences can actually change levels of sex-related hormones like testosterone in our bodies in a second-to-second and month-to-month way!' Sari van Anders, the research chair in social neuroendocrinology at Queen’s University, in Ontario, told me by email."The insistence on separating sports teams strictly by sex is backwards, argues Michela Musto, an assistant sociology professor at the University of British Columbia who has studied the effect of the gender binary on students and young athletes. “Part of the reason why we have this belief that boys are inherently stronger than girls, and even the fact that we believe that gender is a binary, is because of sport itself, not the other way around,” she told me by phone....
Anyway, I tried to find out what "social neuroendocrinology" is. It's a term that has never appeared in the NYT. The term appears twice in Wikipedia, once in a citation to article about testosterone and once in the name of a laboratory at Nipissing University (in Ontario).
If I google the term, at the top of the search I get an announcement for a meeting that occurred in 2018 that says "Social neuroendocrinology is a burgeoning area of research aimed at discovering hormone relationships to social behavior. Studies in this area lie at the intersection of social and personality psychology, neuroscience, cognition, evolutionary psychology, and traditional behavioral endocrinology."
I wonder how much it's "burgeoned" since 2018. I wonder what methods of research are used. Sorry, but I feel skeptical. I mean, I'm sure hormones are at play in human social interactions, but who are these people in the field? Is it good science or is it social activism? "[S]ocial experiences can actually change levels of sex-related hormones like testosterone in our bodies in a second-to-second and month-to-month way!"
It almost sounds like a throwback to old-fashioned ideas about how women, if we engage in traditionally masculine activities, will lose our femininity. If we engage in competitive sports, we may lose the gentle sweetness and caring that makes us so lovable. No need for testosterone injections. With the right social experiences, we can up our testosterone naturally.
Thus articles "And though sex differences in sports show advantages for men, researchers today still don’t know how much of this to attribute to biological difference..."
You now read the article "And though sex differences in sports show advantages for men, researchers today still don’t know how much of this to attribute to biological difference..." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2022/09/and-though-sex-differences-in-sports.html
0 Response to ""And though sex differences in sports show advantages for men, researchers today still don’t know how much of this to attribute to biological difference...""
Post a Comment