Title : "Estimates of just how many babies will be born because of new abortion restrictions vary. One researcher suggests 75,000, another 180,000."
link : "Estimates of just how many babies will be born because of new abortion restrictions vary. One researcher suggests 75,000, another 180,000."
"Estimates of just how many babies will be born because of new abortion restrictions vary. One researcher suggests 75,000, another 180,000."
I'm reading "Many more babies will be born post-'Dobbs.' We need to help them and their moms" by Alyssa Rosenberg (WaPo).That's 75,000 to 180,000 per year. Rosenberg doesn't seem to notice that to emphasize the number of new babies is to say, implicitly, that during the reign of Roe, that's the number, per year, that were quietly and invisibly kept from our presence.
But Rosenberg calls our attention to the importance of making life in America good for parents and children. The end of Roe creates an opportunity to lobby for things like better child care and health services. I would think most of those who longed for an end to Roe would want to join forces with women's rights advocates and work to lighten the burdens of parenthood.
That's Rosenberg's pitch:
It may feel daunting to think bigger and do more than merely try to claw back the rights so recently lost. But these times demand that the entire country — not only those in the abortion-rights camp — be more ambitious. In this extraordinary moment, feminists and family policy advocates should welcome conservatives who are willing to heed the call from former congressional Republican staffers Mark Rodgers and Kiki Bradley to “increase our commitment and, through public resources, help carry the load that we are asking many women to bear.”...
Access to abortion may have let some Americans disregard our broader failures to support mothers and babies. That excuse is gone.
Thus articles "Estimates of just how many babies will be born because of new abortion restrictions vary. One researcher suggests 75,000, another 180,000."
that is all articles "Estimates of just how many babies will be born because of new abortion restrictions vary. One researcher suggests 75,000, another 180,000." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "Estimates of just how many babies will be born because of new abortion restrictions vary. One researcher suggests 75,000, another 180,000." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2022/07/estimates-of-just-how-many-babies-will.html
Related Posts :
"Whenever the national media reports on a black person killed by cops, we must ask ourselves 'Would a white cop not have done that if the person were white?'"- "So he hauled a new generator into his S.U.V., strapped $800 worth of wood onto the vehicle’s roof and drove down into one of the city’s ravines in the middle of the night..."
- "On Friday, West Point officials said in a statement that the [second-chance] program had 'not met its intended purpose' of increasing the self-reporting of honor code violations and reducing cadets’ tolerance for them...."
- Magnolia, scilla, fritillaria.
Bob Ross, resurrected to paint a Mountain Dew ad, is welcome even as it obstructs the "Repo Man" clip I wanted to find.
0 Response to ""Estimates of just how many babies will be born because of new abortion restrictions vary. One researcher suggests 75,000, another 180,000.""
Post a Comment