Title : "This is a pattern in Barr’s book: He nitpicks his way to desired conclusions by carefully navigating a lawyerly path around finely drawn distinctions, all the while lobbing bomblets at anyone he defines as an enemy."
link : "This is a pattern in Barr’s book: He nitpicks his way to desired conclusions by carefully navigating a lawyerly path around finely drawn distinctions, all the while lobbing bomblets at anyone he defines as an enemy."
"This is a pattern in Barr’s book: He nitpicks his way to desired conclusions by carefully navigating a lawyerly path around finely drawn distinctions, all the while lobbing bomblets at anyone he defines as an enemy."
"'For all his urbane affect, Obama was still the left-wing agitator who had patiently steered the Democratic Party toward an illiberal, identity-obsessed progressivism,' Barr writes; no doubt actual 'left-wing agitators,' who have regularly denounced Obama for centrism, would like to have a word. Barr’s version of Trump, meanwhile, contains multitudes: The former president may have 'an imprecise and discursive speaking style,' even a tendency for 'madcap rhetoric,' but Barr also believes Trump has 'a deep intuitive appreciation of the importance of religion to the health of our nation.' Barr muses that 'the country would have benefited and likely seen more of the constructive, problem-solving style of government that President Trump previewed on election night,' if only he 'had been met by a modicum of good faith on the other side.' By 'good faith' Barr is perhaps imagining something like his own generous interpretations of Trump’s behavior, which he goes to great and often tortuous lengths to rationalize in his book.... The last chapter has Barr throwing Trump under the bus, albeit gently and with the utmost decorum. Barr laments Trump’s stubborn problems of 'tone,' faulting him for 'needlessly' alienating 'a large group of white-collar suburbanites,' and declares that it’s time to move on from the loser of the 2020 election by recovering 'something like the old Reagan coalition.' But Barr faces a quandary, which is to explain how Republicans can ditch Trump while keeping his fervent base...."
That description of Barr that I put in the post title — that's what just about everyone does these days. I think Szalai is especially heated up about it because Barr is especially skilled in the craft and, I'm guessing, because she'd like to see that craft applied for the benefit of the other side.
Thus articles "This is a pattern in Barr’s book: He nitpicks his way to desired conclusions by carefully navigating a lawyerly path around finely drawn distinctions, all the while lobbing bomblets at anyone he defines as an enemy."
You now read the article "This is a pattern in Barr’s book: He nitpicks his way to desired conclusions by carefully navigating a lawyerly path around finely drawn distinctions, all the while lobbing bomblets at anyone he defines as an enemy." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2022/02/this-is-pattern-in-barrs-book-he.html
Related Posts :
"Why did I pay all this money for your education?"- "[Michael Jackson] nurtured relationships, including with the boys’ mothers. He spent hours on the phone with James and Wade, he would also call their moms, just to talk to them."
- Agustin Huneeus Jr. — charged in the college admissions scandal — "has been a popular big money-political donor to California’s Congressional Democrats from the San Francisco Bay Area, and Napa Valley."
- "Forty-nine people were killed in shootings at two mosques in central Christchurch, New Zealand, on Friday..."
- At the Tiny-Creatures-of-Madison Café...
0 Response to ""This is a pattern in Barr’s book: He nitpicks his way to desired conclusions by carefully navigating a lawyerly path around finely drawn distinctions, all the while lobbing bomblets at anyone he defines as an enemy.""
Post a Comment