"Some have wondered whether support for B.L.M., especially among white people, is genuine or merely virtue-signaling." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "Some have wondered whether support for B.L.M., especially among white people, is genuine or merely virtue-signaling.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "Some have wondered whether support for B.L.M., especially among white people, is genuine or merely virtue-signaling."
link : "Some have wondered whether support for B.L.M., especially among white people, is genuine or merely virtue-signaling."

"Some have wondered whether support for B.L.M., especially among white people, is genuine or merely virtue-signaling."

"As the volatility of the polling suggests, there is reason to be skeptical. This conversation, however, misrepresents racism as a social problem rooted in individual values rather than as a system forcefully sustained by our institutions. In our opinion, a more fruitful conversation would consider how to transform support for B.L.M., wherever and how tenuous it exists, into more enduring political change. Whether or not this effort will involve substantial numbers of white Americans remains to be seen."

From the last paragraph of a NYT article by a Wellesley professor of social sciences and political science (Jennifer Chudy) and a Stanford polisci prof (Hakeem Jefferson). The article is titled "Support for Black Lives Matter Surged Last Year. Did It Last?"

So... you never really know what white people mean when they say they support Black Lives Matter. Maybe they're only saying what they think they ought to say in order to be seen as the kind of people they want to be thought to be or maybe they adopt opinions in a perfectly shallow way that is mostly about their own vanity. 

The authors acknowledge that's a big problem with the polling. Their answer is to turn away from that line of thinking altogether. They don't care about your individual values. You may be answering the poll questions like a human being who is concerned about your virtue and your reputation for virtue, and they know that's distorting and undermining the poll results. What the authors care about is the "system forcefully sustained by our institutions," and they're hoping to change it.

But is there support for changing it? The authors essentially admit they don't know. They can't know, because the poll respondents are human beings — self-regarding, vain, confused, proud, fearful. The authors want a "conversation" about political change aimed at changing institutions, but somehow they don't want the conversation to deal with the minds of the people they need to influence as they hope to change the institutions. 

They need people to believe that racism is "a system forcefully sustained by our institutions." And you never know what people really believe or how shallow and selfish their beliefs are. The authors' frustration at having to talk about that is understandable — recognizably human. And, of course, a lot of people must want to change the topic of conversation away from the subject the authors insist is the really fruitful topic.

Thus articles "Some have wondered whether support for B.L.M., especially among white people, is genuine or merely virtue-signaling."

that is all articles "Some have wondered whether support for B.L.M., especially among white people, is genuine or merely virtue-signaling." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "Some have wondered whether support for B.L.M., especially among white people, is genuine or merely virtue-signaling." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2021/05/some-have-wondered-whether-support-for.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: