"The danger in presenting a defense case, especially in a prosecution that is so video-dependent, is that it allows the prosecutor..." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "The danger in presenting a defense case, especially in a prosecution that is so video-dependent, is that it allows the prosecutor...", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "The danger in presenting a defense case, especially in a prosecution that is so video-dependent, is that it allows the prosecutor..."
link : "The danger in presenting a defense case, especially in a prosecution that is so video-dependent, is that it allows the prosecutor..."

"The danger in presenting a defense case, especially in a prosecution that is so video-dependent, is that it allows the prosecutor..."

"... through leading questions on cross-examination, to walk witnesses through the video, explaining to the jury moment-by-moment exactly what the prosecution’s theory of the case is. If he does this skillfully, the prosecutor turns his 'questioning' into the equivalent of a summation.... In addition to stressing Chauvin’s patent awareness that Floyd was in pain, the prosecutor had the witness concede that the defendant had been told by his fellow officers that Floyd had lost consciousness, ought to be rolled over on his side (to facilitate breathing), and had no pulse. While defense attorney Eric Nelson had made much of the crowd presence and the possibility that it could pose a threat to the police, Schleicher had Brodd conceding that the crowd was small and posed no threat to the police.... The foundation of Chauvin’s defense is that he had reason to fear that Floyd would regain consciousness and begin resisting arrest again. Schleicher elicited from Brodd the explanation that there is a difference between a threat and a risk: Police may use force to counter a threat they perceive based on some affirmative act by a detainee; but they may not use force based on a mere risk that a detainee might pose a threat at some future point."

From "Chauvin Defense Expert Destroyed on the Stand" by Andrew McCarthy (at National Review). 

***

There is no comments section anymore, but you can email me here. Unless you say otherwise, I will presume you'd enjoy an update to this post with a quote from your email.

Thus articles "The danger in presenting a defense case, especially in a prosecution that is so video-dependent, is that it allows the prosecutor..."

that is all articles "The danger in presenting a defense case, especially in a prosecution that is so video-dependent, is that it allows the prosecutor..." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "The danger in presenting a defense case, especially in a prosecution that is so video-dependent, is that it allows the prosecutor..." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2021/04/the-danger-in-presenting-defense-case.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: