The Case For Why The U.S. Should Not Modernize Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title The Case For Why The U.S. Should Not Modernize Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : The Case For Why The U.S. Should Not Modernize Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force
link : The Case For Why The U.S. Should Not Modernize Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force

The Case For Why The U.S. Should Not Modernize Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force

A static display of intercontinental ballistic missiles at the F.E. Warren Air Force Base, Wyo., front gate the evening of April 4, 2012. From left are the Peacekeeper, the Minuteman III and the Minuteman I. The planet Venus is visible in the sky above the Minuteman missiles and Jupiter is visible to the left of the Minuteman I. (U.S. Air Force photo by R.J. Oriez)  

Defense One: $264B for ICBMs That Would Be Destroyed in the Ground? No, Thanks 

Creating a spiffy new “nuclear sponge” makes neither fiscal nor strategic sense. 

The Biden administration is spending trillions of dollars to address the most pressing challenges we face, such as the pandemic, aging infrastructure and climate change. 

And the more the administration spends, the more the public has a right to ask where this money will come from. 

So far, President Biden is planning to pay for new spending by increasing the national debt and new taxes on corporations. 

We humbly suggest that the administration consider an additional approach: cancelling new nuclear weapons that we do not need. 

The Pentagon is planning to spend $264 billion on a new fleet of 600 land-based nuclear missiles, known as ICBMs. 

This is just part of a trillion-dollar program to rebuild the entire U.S. nuclear arsenal, including new submarines, bombers, and warheads.  

Read more .... 

WNU Editor: The Pentagon wants its land-based nuclear force to be modernize. This modernization request also has a lot of political support. My prediction. It will be built, and it will probably cost more than the $264 billion budget that is being floated around.

Update: More here .... Lawmakers, defense officials joust over next-gen ICBM plans (Defense News).

Thus articles The Case For Why The U.S. Should Not Modernize Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force

that is all articles The Case For Why The U.S. Should Not Modernize Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article The Case For Why The U.S. Should Not Modernize Its Land-Based Nuclear Missile Force with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2021/04/the-case-for-why-us-should-not.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: