Loading...

"Restaurants are fragile; they compete with each other, but the collective of local restaurants is antifragile for that very reason."

"Restaurants are fragile; they compete with each other, but the collective of local restaurants is antifragile for that very reason." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "Restaurants are fragile; they compete with each other, but the collective of local restaurants is antifragile for that very reason.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "Restaurants are fragile; they compete with each other, but the collective of local restaurants is antifragile for that very reason."
link : "Restaurants are fragile; they compete with each other, but the collective of local restaurants is antifragile for that very reason."

see also


"Restaurants are fragile; they compete with each other, but the collective of local restaurants is antifragile for that very reason."

"Had restaurants been individually robust, hence immortal, the overall business would be either stagnant or weak, and would deliver nothing better than cafeteria food — and I mean Soviet-style cafeteria food. Further, it would be marred with systemic shortages, with, once in a while, a complete crisis and government bailout. All that quality, stability, and reliability are owed to the fragility of the restaurant itself."

A quote from the 2012 book "Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder," that I quoted before, in a comment on a 2013 post of mine called "Notes on success from 2 Scotts — Adams and Fitzgerald — and one Bob."

The quote is newly interesting in this time of the coronavirus! Individual restaurants are dying like mad — "One in three New York restaurants won’t open after the pandemic." Does that "Antifragile" quote inject optimism into this horrible experience? The "collective of local restaurants" will do well because the individual places go under? Does that still apply when a third of the restaurants go under within one year... and the ones that survive are disabled from picking up the slack? The customers who would pack the remaining restaurants are building up the desire to come back whenever it's possible to eat out again.

Why was I reading that old post? I saw that Scott Adams tweeted a link to a post of mine yesterday, and it made me wonder how many times I'd blogged about him. Answer: 204. Most of that is from January 2016 and later, but there are 2 earlier posts, one from 2011 (about boredom) and the one from 2013 with the "Notes on success." Fitzgerald is F. Scott Fitzgerald, and Bob is, of course, Bob Dylan.


Thus articles "Restaurants are fragile; they compete with each other, but the collective of local restaurants is antifragile for that very reason."

that is all articles "Restaurants are fragile; they compete with each other, but the collective of local restaurants is antifragile for that very reason." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "Restaurants are fragile; they compete with each other, but the collective of local restaurants is antifragile for that very reason." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2020/08/restaurants-are-fragile-they-compete.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to ""Restaurants are fragile; they compete with each other, but the collective of local restaurants is antifragile for that very reason.""

Post a Comment

Loading...