Loading...

"My gut says that what Reade alleges did not happen. My head instructs that it is within the realm of possibility..."

"My gut says that what Reade alleges did not happen. My head instructs that it is within the realm of possibility..." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "My gut says that what Reade alleges did not happen. My head instructs that it is within the realm of possibility...", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "My gut says that what Reade alleges did not happen. My head instructs that it is within the realm of possibility..."
link : "My gut says that what Reade alleges did not happen. My head instructs that it is within the realm of possibility..."

see also


"My gut says that what Reade alleges did not happen. My head instructs that it is within the realm of possibility..."

"... and fairness requires acknowledging that. And there is another point to bear in mind: Double standards work in both directions. Those who disbelieved and diminished Christine Blasey Ford face the challenge of explaining why they seem so much more eager to credit Tara Reade’s account."

Writes Ruth Marcus in "Assessing Tara Reade’s allegations" (WaPo). Marcus wrote a book about Christine Blasey Ford and concluded that she was telling the truth. This column is (or purports to be) Marcus's effort to not be a hypocrite.
Outrage over misbehavior only by those with whom we have ideological differences is not righteous — it is hypocritical. Skepticism about accusations only when they are made against someone with whom we are ideologically aligned is not high-minded — it is intellectually dishonest.

And yet. Reflexive acceptance of any and all allegations of sexual misconduct against any man is not staunch feminism — it is dangerous credulity that risks doing terrible injustice to the accused. #BelieveAllWomen was a dumb hashtag and a dumber approach to inevitably complex, fact-bound situations. I have always tried to argue in favor of fact-finding first, conviction later, whether in the court of public opinion, in the Senate confirmation process or elsewhere....
I won't detail Marcus's assessment of the evidence in the Reade and Blasey Ford cases, but I wanted to point to something said in the comments over there. This combines 3 different commenters:
Women of a certain age, and Ms. Reade is one, know that we all wore pantyhose in those days in DC.... I have difficulty in thinking a female staffer on the Hill in the spring of 1993 was not wearing hose with a business skirt.... I'm a retired physician and a woman. I've done a lot of pelvic exams in my life and I honestly don't see how a standing man could reach under a standing woman's layers of clothes and insert a finger without groping, fumbling and cooperation.... Especially if she was wearing pantyhose....


Thus articles "My gut says that what Reade alleges did not happen. My head instructs that it is within the realm of possibility..."

that is all articles "My gut says that what Reade alleges did not happen. My head instructs that it is within the realm of possibility..." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "My gut says that what Reade alleges did not happen. My head instructs that it is within the realm of possibility..." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2020/04/my-gut-says-that-what-reade-alleges-did.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to ""My gut says that what Reade alleges did not happen. My head instructs that it is within the realm of possibility...""

Post a Comment

Loading...