Loading...

"I I was surprised at how badly-written this book is. First of all, the very first line has an obscure reference to Holden Caulfield."

"I I was surprised at how badly-written this book is. First of all, the very first line has an obscure reference to Holden Caulfield." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "I I was surprised at how badly-written this book is. First of all, the very first line has an obscure reference to Holden Caulfield.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "I I was surprised at how badly-written this book is. First of all, the very first line has an obscure reference to Holden Caulfield."
link : "I I was surprised at how badly-written this book is. First of all, the very first line has an obscure reference to Holden Caulfield."

see also


"I I was surprised at how badly-written this book is. First of all, the very first line has an obscure reference to Holden Caulfield."

"Does he not realize that Catcher int he Rye is not the touchstone it once was?... I suspect that age has hindered his ability to write coherently, The book could have used a very strong editor, or an editor at all. Some sentences are so labored and confusing that they have to be read a number of times to be understood. Perhaps his vanity prevented him from seeking an editor who could have corralled it into a better book...."

From a 2-star review of Woody Allen's autobiography "A Propos of Nothing." Something made me want to read bad reviews at Amazon instead of this WaPo piece I'd clicked on: "If you’ve run out of toilet paper, Woody Allen’s memoir is also made of paper."

I'm reading the book. The first few sentences are especially good:
Like Holden, I don’t feel like going into all that David Copperfield kind of crap, although in my case, a little about my parents you may find more interesting than reading about me. Like my father, born in Brooklyn when it was all farms, ball boy for the early Brooklyn Dodgers, a pool hustler, a bookmaker, a small man but a tough Jew in fancy shirts with slicked-back patent leather hair a la George Raft. No high school, the Navy at sixteen, on a firing squad in France when they killed an American sailor for raping a local girl. A medal-winning marksman, always loved pulling a trigger and carried a pistol till the day he died with a full head of silver hair and twenty-twenty eyesight at a hundred. One night during World War I his boat got hit by a shell somewhere off the coast in the icy waters of Europe. It sank. Everyone drowned except for three guys who made the miles-long swim to shore. He was one of the three that could handle the Atlantic. But that’s how close I came to never being born.
The famous — not obscure! — first sentence of "Catcher in the Rye" is:

If you really want to hear about it, the first thing you’ll probably want to know is where I was born, and what my lousy childhood was like, and how my parents were occupied and all before they had me, and all that David Copperfield kind of crap, but I don’t feel like going into it, if you want to know the truth.
If that's obscure, then reading is obsolete, and what does it matter that a writer refers to it?

Here's the beginning of "David Copperfield" that writers who want to begin in the middle of the story establish their voice by calling "crap":
Whether I shall turn out to be the hero of my own life, or whether that station will be held by anybody else, these pages must show. To begin my life with the beginning of my life, I record that I was born (as I have been informed and believe) on a Friday, at twelve o’clock at night. It was remarked that the clock began to strike, and I began to cry, simultaneously....


Thus articles "I I was surprised at how badly-written this book is. First of all, the very first line has an obscure reference to Holden Caulfield."

that is all articles "I I was surprised at how badly-written this book is. First of all, the very first line has an obscure reference to Holden Caulfield." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "I I was surprised at how badly-written this book is. First of all, the very first line has an obscure reference to Holden Caulfield." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2020/03/i-i-was-surprised-at-how-badly-written.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to ""I I was surprised at how badly-written this book is. First of all, the very first line has an obscure reference to Holden Caulfield.""

Post a Comment

Loading...