Title : We're not seeing Hillary Clinton's new face. We're seeing a photograph of her face.
link : We're not seeing Hillary Clinton's new face. We're seeing a photograph of her face.
We're not seeing Hillary Clinton's new face. We're seeing a photograph of her face.
I'm exasperated with articles like "What is the secret of Hillary Clinton's strangely plumped-up-cheeks? Fillers could be behind more youthful look" (Daily Mail).First, this startling new picture just looks ridiculously smooth from the bottom of the eyeballs to the top of the smile lines. Isn't it just bad photoshopping?
Second, the comparison photograph of her with full aging on display (from a few days earlier) looks much better. What matters isn't whether you look older or younger but whether you look worse or better. She obviously looks better with all the elements of her face in the same condition, working together, seeming normal than with a weird smoothing through the center only.
Third, boring as I find the Daily Mail's interviews with plastic surgeons who speculate about what "work" might have been done, I do love the commenter antics over there. The top-rated comment is: "Reminds me of a hamster I had as a teenager. Such a cheerful grin it had, especially when its face was stuffed with peanuts."
Thus articles We're not seeing Hillary Clinton's new face. We're seeing a photograph of her face.
that is all articles We're not seeing Hillary Clinton's new face. We're seeing a photograph of her face. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article We're not seeing Hillary Clinton's new face. We're seeing a photograph of her face. with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/12/were-not-seeing-hillary-clintons-new.html
0 Response to "We're not seeing Hillary Clinton's new face. We're seeing a photograph of her face."
Post a Comment