"Donald Trump Campaign Disputes Claim that Photo of President as Rocky Balboa Was 'Doctored.'" - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "Donald Trump Campaign Disputes Claim that Photo of President as Rocky Balboa Was 'Doctored.'", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "Donald Trump Campaign Disputes Claim that Photo of President as Rocky Balboa Was 'Doctored.'"
link : "Donald Trump Campaign Disputes Claim that Photo of President as Rocky Balboa Was 'Doctored.'"

"Donald Trump Campaign Disputes Claim that Photo of President as Rocky Balboa Was 'Doctored.'"

Says Newsweek, and I hope they know they're being funny, but they seem to have a hard time acknowledging that the Trump side of this is funny.

WaPo was dumb enough to tweet, "Trump tweets doctored photo of his head on Sylvester Stallone’s body, unclear why." Most responses seemed to be laughing at WaPo for saying that what was obviously photoshopped was "doctored" — as if something hard to detect and sneaky was doing on.

But Team Trump was witty enough to say, "Washington Post claims - without evidence - that @realDonaldTrump shared a 'doctored' photo."

That's not — as Newsweek imagines — a dispute of WaPo's "claim" that the photo did not show the real body of Donald Trump. It's making fun of WaPo for saying what didn't need to be said.

I believe it is also intended as mockery of the use of the phrase "without evidence" in reports on the impeachment hearings. I was just blogging about that little journalistic trick, back on November 11th. A NYT article — "What Joe Biden Actually Did in Ukraine" — said "Mr. Giuliani has claimed, without evidence, that Mr. Biden’s push to oust Mr. Shokin was an attempt to block scrutiny of his son’s actions...." I wrote:

We have evidence of Biden's statements and activities, but we don't know what was in his head, but he could have been motivated by a desire to cover for his son. That's an inference you could make from the evidence, and it's always hard to prove what's inside somebody's head.

The impeachment investigation is nearly all about proving what was inside Trump's head in his dealing with Ukraine (was it solely his own political advantage or did it devoid of any concern for American interests?).

I'd just like to see a consistent approach to talking about other people's thoughts. You could say "without evidence" whenever you're making an inference about thought from the evidence that we do have. Or you could make inferences from the evidence and just speak about them as if the inferences are evidence.

Of course, I don't realistically believe I'll ever see that consistent approach, but I have that ideal, and with that grounding, I found the Trump Team's "without evidence" very funny.

Thus articles "Donald Trump Campaign Disputes Claim that Photo of President as Rocky Balboa Was 'Doctored.'"

that is all articles "Donald Trump Campaign Disputes Claim that Photo of President as Rocky Balboa Was 'Doctored.'" This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "Donald Trump Campaign Disputes Claim that Photo of President as Rocky Balboa Was 'Doctored.'" with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/11/donald-trump-campaign-disputes-claim.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: