Title : "But what if the WB is a vehement Ukraine hawk, with strong ties to Joe Biden and Democrats?"
link : "But what if the WB is a vehement Ukraine hawk, with strong ties to Joe Biden and Democrats?"
"But what if the WB is a vehement Ukraine hawk, with strong ties to Joe Biden and Democrats?"
Writes Mickey Kaus, explaining why the identity of whistleblower is important even though we have the transcript:The point wouldn’t be that the whole thing then smells like a long-hatched anti-Trump conspiracy (though it does)....
The point is that seemingly everyone in the WB’s network of outrage, from the person who told the WB about the call to Col. Vindman (the National Security Council Ukraine expert who’s testified before Rep. Schiff’s impeachment panel) to Ambassador William Taylor (who’d written a text calling it “crazy” to hold-up aid to Ukraine “for help in a political campaign”) to the aide in Schiff’s office consulted by the WB may be sincerely, passionately inflating the importance of Trump's sin--and deflating Biden's-- because to them aiding Ukraine is wildly important and Joe Biden is a compatriot, mentor or hero.
Voters and the senators— who will have to determine whether Trump's tactics were a "high crime”— may have a less fraught perspective and discount the offense accordingly. That would be harder to do if the prime accusers weren't all vehement anti-Russia Ukrainiacs....
This isn't like a drug deal where an undercover informant can drop a dime and then disappear while the perp is tried. We know the drug deal was a drug deal. We don't know what kind of a deal this was. What was Trump's intent? Was he interested in actual corruption, or was that a fake concern? How did the Ukrainians interpret it -- as a serious threat to the aid or just a classic Trump feint to be abandoned relatively quickly if resisted? What was the meaning of the demand for a press conference — was the idea to lock Zelensky into the investigation or to give Trump some cheap oppo optics? Did any of the pro-Ukraine Trump administration conspirators express any doubts about their outrage?
Thus articles "But what if the WB is a vehement Ukraine hawk, with strong ties to Joe Biden and Democrats?"
that is all articles "But what if the WB is a vehement Ukraine hawk, with strong ties to Joe Biden and Democrats?" This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "But what if the WB is a vehement Ukraine hawk, with strong ties to Joe Biden and Democrats?" with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/11/but-what-if-wb-is-vehement-ukraine-hawk.html
Related Posts :
"[R]egardless of the effectiveness of [Kanye] West’s precise words, he does represent something — and that something is frightening to Democrats."- I watched all 3 parts of ABC's "20/20" show with Melania Trump.
Reasons to eat chocolate... from Brazil.- "For decades, China’s middle school students were introduced to the world’s first seismograph through an image in their history textbooks: a large, bronze urn with eight dragons perched the same distance apart along the outside, each with a copper ball hanging precariously in its mouth."
- "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face."
0 Response to ""But what if the WB is a vehement Ukraine hawk, with strong ties to Joe Biden and Democrats?""
Post a Comment