Title : "Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing instead of appearing in person..."
link : "Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing instead of appearing in person..."
"Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing instead of appearing in person..."
"... according to people familiar with the matter. The request reflects concerns about whether the whistleblower could testify to Democrats and Republicans without revealing his identity, and fears that doing so would lead to it being publicly leaked, jeopardizing his personal safety. The intelligence committees haven't yet responded to the inquiry, the people said."The Wall Street Journal reports.
Safety is important, but what about our interest in assessing this person's credibility? I want to look the person in the face and hear the voice. Is the person's identity to be kept secret, so that there's no opportunity to consider bias and political motivation? Why are we bothering with this person at all when we have the transcript of the famous telephone call? If it's not to put a face on the accusation, do we even care? Of course, I think the impeachment inquiry is all political theater, and theater isn't theater if the actors don't strut and fret their hour upon the stage.
Thus articles "Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing instead of appearing in person..."
that is all articles "Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing instead of appearing in person..." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing instead of appearing in person..." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/10/lawyers-for-cia-officer-whose.html
Related Posts :
Facebook prods me to vote — with racialized hands of different sizes.
"And while the president has never communicated his frustrations directly to Mr. Garland, he has said privately that he wanted Mr. Garland to act less like a ponderous judge and more like a prosecutor..."- "The vast majority of those leaving Ukraine are women and girls and the vast majority of those trafficked are women and girls so you can see the math is not good. It’s a toxic cocktail of risk."
- "The smaller Ukrainian force was vastly underestimated. 'It’s really been kind of astonishing, in the sort of the cynicism, the stupidity with which the operation was carried out.'"
Must I cover the Will Smith resigns! story?
0 Response to ""Lawyers for the CIA officer whose whistleblower complaint helped ignite an impeachment inquiry into President Trump have asked Congress whether their client could submit testimony in writing instead of appearing in person...""
Post a Comment