Title : "Had they seen that same issue in a woman who was not a woman of color, they would not have felt empowered to take me off the plane."
link : "Had they seen that same issue in a woman who was not a woman of color, they would not have felt empowered to take me off the plane."
"Had they seen that same issue in a woman who was not a woman of color, they would not have felt empowered to take me off the plane."
"In pop culture, especially black women with a body like mine, they’re often portrayed as video vixens. So I’ve had to deal with those stereotypes my whole life"/"We are policed for being black... I’ve seen white women with much shorter shorts board a plane without a blink of an eye. I guess if it’s a ‘nice ass’ vs. a Serena Booty it’s O.K."Wrote Tisha Rowe — on Twitter and Facebook — quoted in "Woman Required to Cover Up on American Airlines Flight Says Race Was a Factor/Dr. Tisha Rowe was about to fly from Jamaica to Miami when a flight attendant briefly removed her from the plane because of her romper, she said" (NYT).
Dr. Rowe said she was walking to her seat when a male flight attendant, whom she described as black, asked her to return to the front of the plane. Another flight attendant, who was also black, then spoke to her about her appearance while she stood on the jet bridge, Dr. Rowe said.So... the airline has a dress code with improper grammar. How's a person to know what's "appropriate" in this world? The airline is specific about one thing: bare feet. I take that to mean it's okay to wear flip flops. Or does it depend on whether the feet you expose are hairy and gnarly?
“She poses the question to me, ‘Do you have a jacket?’” Dr. Rowe said. “I said, ‘No, I do not.’ I’ve been given no explanation as to why I was taken off the plane. So finally she says, ‘You’re not boarding the plane dressed like that.’ Then they started to give me a lecture about how when I got on the plane, I better not make a scene or be loud.”
The airline’s conditions of carriage, which are posted on its website, make a brief reference to a dress code: “Dress appropriately; bare feet or offensive clothing aren’t allowed.”
That's the trouble with the "offensiveness" standard! It doesn't address the clothing, but the way other people react to YOU in the clothing. But the airline doesn't want to get specific and say no bared shoulders or clothing must cover your legs at least to mid-thigh — even though your seatmates have an obvious interest in not having to be in contact with your bare flesh.
With that subjective standard, any enforcement is going to feel personal, and inevitably that will mean that people will feel that race and gender and age and level of attractiveness are going to be part of the judgment — whether it is or not. I doubt if the employees enforcing the rule can even know whether they're using inappropriate factors in applying their standard of appropriateness. It's a paradox of propriety.
Thus articles "Had they seen that same issue in a woman who was not a woman of color, they would not have felt empowered to take me off the plane."
that is all articles "Had they seen that same issue in a woman who was not a woman of color, they would not have felt empowered to take me off the plane." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "Had they seen that same issue in a woman who was not a woman of color, they would not have felt empowered to take me off the plane." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/07/had-they-seen-that-same-issue-in-woman.html
0 Response to ""Had they seen that same issue in a woman who was not a woman of color, they would not have felt empowered to take me off the plane.""
Post a Comment