It's not doing Kamala Harris any favors to go easy on her. She needs to be tested and challenged if she's to be the nominee. - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title It's not doing Kamala Harris any favors to go easy on her. She needs to be tested and challenged if she's to be the nominee., we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : It's not doing Kamala Harris any favors to go easy on her. She needs to be tested and challenged if she's to be the nominee.
link : It's not doing Kamala Harris any favors to go easy on her. She needs to be tested and challenged if she's to be the nominee.

It's not doing Kamala Harris any favors to go easy on her. She needs to be tested and challenged if she's to be the nominee.

I'm reading "Kamala Harris’s claim that Medicare-for-all ‘doesn’t get rid of all insurance’" from Glenn Kessler, the WaPo "fact checker" who normally has a system of ratings that gives out "Pinocchios." He concludes:

Call us skeptical, but Section 107 looks like a loophole for single-payer supporters to claim that private insurance is not being eliminated, even as the main sponsor says he wants to put health insurance companies out of the business. There is virtually nothing left on the table but a few crumbs. Harris called it “supplemental insurance,” which sounds a lot like Medigap policies, but the reality is likely far different than that.

Given the back-and-forth between Harris and Tapper, we can’t quite award Pinocchios. But her language is slippery. She could more forthrightly admit that the health plan she supports envisions virtually no role for the private insurance now used by nearly 220 million Americans.

Is this special kid-gloves treatment for Kamala Harris? Here's the explanation of the Pinocchio system.

One Pinocchio means: "Some shading of the facts. Selective telling of the truth. Some omissions and exaggerations, but no outright falsehoods. (You could view this as 'mostly true.')" She doesn't even get one?

Two means: "Significant omissions and/or exaggerations. Some factual error may be involved but not necessarily. A politician can create a false, misleading impression by playing with words and using legalistic language that means little to ordinary people. (Similar to 'half true.')" I think the fact check sounds more like a 2 Pinocchio rating.

Three means: "Significant factual error and/or obvious contradictions. This gets into the realm of 'mostly false.' But it could include statements which are technically correct (such as based on official government data) but are so taken out of context as to be very misleading. The line between Two and Three can be bit fuzzy and we do not award half-Pinocchios. So we strive to explain the factors that tipped us toward a Three." If Trump were equally unforthcoming and truth-suppressing, would he not get 3 Pinocchios?

I think Kamala Harris is going to become irrelevant if she isn't confronted and forced to improve. I wonder if she finds the polls mystifying.

Thus articles It's not doing Kamala Harris any favors to go easy on her. She needs to be tested and challenged if she's to be the nominee.

that is all articles It's not doing Kamala Harris any favors to go easy on her. She needs to be tested and challenged if she's to be the nominee. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article It's not doing Kamala Harris any favors to go easy on her. She needs to be tested and challenged if she's to be the nominee. with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/05/its-not-doing-kamala-harris-any-favors.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: