"Emma, a healthy Shih Tzu mix, was euthanized recently because her owner left explicit instructions in her will..." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "Emma, a healthy Shih Tzu mix, was euthanized recently because her owner left explicit instructions in her will...", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "Emma, a healthy Shih Tzu mix, was euthanized recently because her owner left explicit instructions in her will..."
link : "Emma, a healthy Shih Tzu mix, was euthanized recently because her owner left explicit instructions in her will..."

"Emma, a healthy Shih Tzu mix, was euthanized recently because her owner left explicit instructions in her will..."

"The fur baby was to be put down — and laid to rest with her. 'Heartbroken' shelter volunteers at Chesterfield County Animal Services — where Emma had a two-week reprieve from death — said she was a well-bred, pampered and much-loved pup. They appealed to the executor of the dead woman’s estate, begging them to not go through with ending Emma’s life — but their pleas were ignored.... After she was cremated, her ashes were placed in an urn and returned to the 'authorized representative of the estate,' following her owner’s last wishes to the letter.... 'WTF!!! people don’t care for animals in life or death!!! this is heartless, inhumane, and pitiful!!!!,' one particularly heated [tweet] reads. 'And the people who killed said dog are even more trash!!' While killing healthy pets so they can be interned with owners is sparking ethical debates on social media, the law is crystal clear, says Larry Spiaggi, president of the Virginia Funeral Directors Association. 'It’s not legal to put a dog’s cremated remains — or any animal — in a casket and bury them,' says Spiaggi as his chocolate Lab, Peace, trots laps around him."

I'm reading "Healthy dog euthanized to be buried with dead owner as her will requested") in the NY Post.

First, the word is "interred" (not "interned").

Second, the article is clear that the dog cannot and will not be "be buried with dead owner," so that headline is pathetic. The dog was killed and cremated ashes were given to the estate. And the quoted funeral expert explained the law on the subject. It's one thing to have your dog killed, and you can do that, but putting nonhuman animal remains in a cemetery is outlawed. I can see why. One lady might want her dog in her casket with her, but the other people using the cemetery don't want it to be a pet cemetery.

Third, I'll leave it to you to discuss how awful it is to dictate that your dog be put down when you die. I wonder exactly what the thinking was. I imagine the woman believed and wanted to believe that the dog was so completely bonded to her that it could not live with another person and it would require a mercy killing without her. Or maybe she believed that the dog would be released to join her in the afterlife. It's not necessary to judge the dead woman to be a horrible person, even though I don't like that the dog was killed.

Thus articles "Emma, a healthy Shih Tzu mix, was euthanized recently because her owner left explicit instructions in her will..."

that is all articles "Emma, a healthy Shih Tzu mix, was euthanized recently because her owner left explicit instructions in her will..." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "Emma, a healthy Shih Tzu mix, was euthanized recently because her owner left explicit instructions in her will..." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/05/emma-healthy-shih-tzu-mix-was.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: