"In Washington, she hasn’t done much—let’s be honest, who in the Senate has in recent years?" - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "In Washington, she hasn’t done much—let’s be honest, who in the Senate has in recent years?", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "In Washington, she hasn’t done much—let’s be honest, who in the Senate has in recent years?"
link : "In Washington, she hasn’t done much—let’s be honest, who in the Senate has in recent years?"

"In Washington, she hasn’t done much—let’s be honest, who in the Senate has in recent years?"

"She introduced a few bills: one, with Kentucky Republican Rand Paul, to study reforming the cash-bail system; another, with 13 Democratic colleagues, to begin addressing the high mortality rates black women face in childbirth. She also introduced, with fellow Democratic presidential candidate Cory Booker and Republican Tim Scott, a bill to make lynching a hate crime. This last one was classic Harris: tough on crime, seemingly progressive, entirely risk-free. It passed the Senate unanimously."

From "Can Kamala Harris Win?/No other matchup would be as riveting—or as revealing—as Harris versus Trump. But first she has to get through the primaries" by Elizabeth Weil (The Atlantic). I extracted the most substantive paragraph and it's notable for its lack of support for the proposition that her matchup with Trump would be riveting and revealing (or the way it only supports it from an angle The Atlantic doesn't intend).

So what's riveting and revealing? The article is a long slog, but I'll fish this out:

The very fact of her campaign, Harris standing out there every day before crowds of thousands, presenting herself to the American people—some of whom will merely dissect her record; others of whom will see her female body and her brown skin, and want her dead—is bold and brave. 

That is such a lame and insulting assertion.

Let's try again... what would be riveting and revealing about Kamala Harris as the Democratic Party nominee? We're getting close to the end of the article.

It’s hard not to be ambivalent about a cautious person, particularly a person who has been working for you but holding back, saving for the future. In truth, it’s hard not to feel ambivalent about all the candidates. There are so many contenders, more of them popping up like white-haired crocuses every day. One is too old. (Well, two are too old.) One’s too mean to her staff. One said she was Native American and she’s not. One Instagrammed his trip to the dentist. So many Americans have conflicting desires for this election. They want a transformative leader who will push this country forward. They want a rescue, a captain to steady our faltering ship of state and restore the rule of law. Most of all, they want a winner—whoever that is, just tell them, they’ll vote that way. They want a sure thing. They need a sure thing. And then they feel scared and frustrated by all the options, because that’s not how the system works.

And then the article piddles out, with scenes of Harris reading cookie recipes and shopping for clothes.

Thus articles "In Washington, she hasn’t done much—let’s be honest, who in the Senate has in recent years?"

that is all articles "In Washington, she hasn’t done much—let’s be honest, who in the Senate has in recent years?" This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "In Washington, she hasn’t done much—let’s be honest, who in the Senate has in recent years?" with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/04/in-washington-she-hasnt-done-muchlets.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: