Title : "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..."
link : "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..."
"Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..."
"If you think they are clueless, you can coach them... Clueless can become creepy very quickly if you don’t address it. If they are creepy, you have to act."Said Pat Milligan, who advises companies about gender issues, quoted in "Another Side of #MeToo: Male Managers Fearful of Mentoring Women" (NYT). She's trying to overcome the problem the title refers to.
There's also this, from Marc Pritchard: "It’s not enough to stand by when toxic masculinity is on display. It’s not enough to stand by and say ‘that’s not me.’ You need to be a role model for the next generation.... We need something like Lean In circles for men."
The NYT identifies Pritchard as the chief brand officer for Procter & Gamble, but it doesn't mention that P&G owns Gillette and that Gillette just put out that strange commercial that actually uses the term "toxic masculinity."
Anyway, I think Milligan's triad might be helpful — clueless, creepy, or criminal. Not that it's easy to know and to perceive where these lines are.
"Toxic masculinity" is a problematic term for general use because it has 2 possible meanings, as I discussed a few days ago:
The okay meaning sees the adjective "toxic" in "toxic masculinity" like the adjective "red" in "red shoes." It identifies a subcategory — the shoes that are red (as opposed to all the many other shoes) and the masculinity that is toxic (as opposed to all the other masculinity).I did a little survey that I think shows why the term should be avoided:
The hateful meaning sees the adjective "toxic" in "toxic masculinity" like the adjective "beloved" in "beloved country." You're referring to one thing — one country or masculinity as a single concept — and you're branding it as "beloved" or "toxic."
Thus articles "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..."
that is all articles "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'..." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/01/once-companies-have-identified-those.html
Related Posts :
"My mom is a person that says like, 'You know, they killed their parents, and that’s wrong.'"- "[I]nsisting on this taboo [of the n-word] makes it look like black people are numb to the difference between usage and reference, vague on the notion of meta, given to overgeneralization rather than to making distinctions."
- "What if They Held an Impeachment Trial and Nobody Came?/Maybe it’s a good thing that we’re more focused on Biden. Or maybe we’ve just given up.... Let’s not start with impeachment trial No. 2...."
- At the Monday Night Cafe...
"It’s as much a war movie as anything else, with a woman as the general, and her gender isn’t the chink in her armor."
0 Response to ""Once companies have identified those who make women uncomfortable, they have to assess whether the men are 'clueless, creepy or criminal'...""
Post a Comment