Loading...

New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question.

New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question. - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question., we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question.
link : New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question.

see also


New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question.

On February 20, 2005, I asked whether it's "party hardy" or "party hearty." The NYT had written "party hardy," and that was the first time I'd noticed the near homophones and the potential for either word to make sense — with a slight difference of meaning:
If you're trying to wish the person well in holding up to all that drinking, it's "hardy." If you want them to have a lot of rollicking fun, it's "hearty." If you're trying to say both, stick to the spoken word. If you're the NYT, and you mean to insult the catty, exclusionary state school girls, "hardy" actually is the better choice.
 I love when people comment on old posts, especially really old posts, and I was pleased to see that "Unknown" stopped by last night to contribute this:



Thus articles New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question.

that is all articles New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question. with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/01/new-evidence-answering-14-year-old.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

Related Posts :

0 Response to "New evidence, answering a 14-year-old question."

Post a Comment

Loading...