"As soon as the new view of Sandmann emerged, I said (ask Meade), people need to resist trashing Phillips." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "As soon as the new view of Sandmann emerged, I said (ask Meade), people need to resist trashing Phillips.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "As soon as the new view of Sandmann emerged, I said (ask Meade), people need to resist trashing Phillips."
link : "As soon as the new view of Sandmann emerged, I said (ask Meade), people need to resist trashing Phillips."

"As soon as the new view of Sandmann emerged, I said (ask Meade), people need to resist trashing Phillips."

"Both Phillips and Sandmann were ordinary people living private lives in obscurity. They each did something that got them into the spotlight, but neither really asked or was at all prepared to be inspected and judged by millions. We should be charitable toward both of them. Ideally, they would never have been a news story at all. It is the media — mainstream and social — that deserve criticism."

I'm just front-paging something I wrote in "The Green Rat Café."

This made me want to read "The Principle of Charity" (Wikipedia):

In philosophy and rhetoric, the principle of charity or charitable interpretation requires interpreting a speaker's statements in the most rational way possible and, in the case of any argument, considering its best, strongest possible interpretation....

[Donald] Davidson sometimes referred to it as the principle of rational accommodation. He summarized it: We make maximum sense of the words and thoughts of others when we interpret in a way that optimises agreement. The principle may be invoked to make sense of a speaker's utterances when one is unsure of their meaning...

[There are] at least four versions of the principle of charity...

1. The other uses words in the ordinary way;
2. The other makes true statements;
3. The other makes valid arguments;
4. The other says something interesting.

A related principle is the principle of humanity, which states that we must assume that another speaker's beliefs and desires are connected to each other and to reality in some way, and attribute to him or her "the propositional attitudes one supposes one would have oneself in those circumstances"...

I'm making a tag "the principle of charity/humanity," because I think it might help me (and you!) remember to do something I very much believe in doing. You might say it's too close to calls for civility (which I'm known for calling "civility bullshit"), but it's not the same thing. It's not about tone. It's about interpretation and understanding.

Thus articles "As soon as the new view of Sandmann emerged, I said (ask Meade), people need to resist trashing Phillips."

that is all articles "As soon as the new view of Sandmann emerged, I said (ask Meade), people need to resist trashing Phillips." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "As soon as the new view of Sandmann emerged, I said (ask Meade), people need to resist trashing Phillips." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/01/as-soon-as-new-view-of-sandmann-emerged.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: