Loading...

Slate crosses a taste line I wouldn't cross.

Slate crosses a taste line I wouldn't cross. - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title Slate crosses a taste line I wouldn't cross., we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : Slate crosses a taste line I wouldn't cross.
link : Slate crosses a taste line I wouldn't cross.

see also


Slate crosses a taste line I wouldn't cross.

I'm seeing "There’s Nothing Sentimental About That Viral Photo of H.W. Bush’s Service Dog" on the front page at Slate, linking to "Don’t Spend Your Emotional Energy on Sully H.W. Bush/He’s a service dog who had been with the president for six months, not his lifelong companion."

I'd passed along the now-famous photo first thing yesterday morning, in a post with the minimal title "A photo."

After a few people had commented, I added one more thing, tucked away in the comments: "It's a lovely, expressive photograph, the artwork of human beings. I don't believe the dog knows his master is in the casket." That's as much as I thought I should say.

But here's Slate's Ruth Graham:
It’s wonderful for Bush that he had a trained service animal like Sully available to him [for 6] months. It’s a good thing that the dog is moving on to another gig where he can be helpful to other people (rather than becoming another Bush family pet). But it’s a bit demented to project soul-wrenching grief onto a dog’s decision to lie down in front of a casket. Is Sully “heroic” for learning to obey the human beings who taught him to perform certain tasks? Does the photo say anything special about this dog’s particular loyalty or judgment, or is he just … there? Also, if dogs are subject to praise for obeying their masters, what do we do about the pets who eat their owners’ dead (or even just passed-out) bodies?...

This is simply a photograph of a dog doing something dogs love to do: Lie down. The frenzy around it captures something humans love to do, too: Project our own emotional needs onto animals.
I'd go further than Graham on one point. I don't think it was the "dog's decision to lie down in front of the casket." I think he was brought in a commanded to lie down, which he did because of his training. But I don't agree that it's "demented" to project human emotion onto the dog. It's what we do. It's human nature. Dog nature is to respond to human training and commands, and human nature is to understand reality through reason and emotion. We make art that stimulates and stabilizes our emotions as we grasp for meaning in the face of the reality we know too well: Death. The dog knows little about death and nothing about photography, the American flag, the contents of the wooden box. The dog is not demented and neither are the people who felt calmed and exalted by his lying there on the carpet.


Thus articles Slate crosses a taste line I wouldn't cross.

that is all articles Slate crosses a taste line I wouldn't cross. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article Slate crosses a taste line I wouldn't cross. with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2018/12/slate-crosses-taste-line-i-wouldnt-cross.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to "Slate crosses a taste line I wouldn't cross."

Post a Comment

Loading...