Loading...

"If our defense rests on my ability to explain what a play is without sounding condescending, we’re completely screwed."

"If our defense rests on my ability to explain what a play is without sounding condescending, we’re completely screwed." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "If our defense rests on my ability to explain what a play is without sounding condescending, we’re completely screwed.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "If our defense rests on my ability to explain what a play is without sounding condescending, we’re completely screwed."
link : "If our defense rests on my ability to explain what a play is without sounding condescending, we’re completely screwed."

see also


"If our defense rests on my ability to explain what a play is without sounding condescending, we’re completely screwed."

Said Aaron Sorkin, as quoted by Aaron Sorkin, writing about the litigation that almost thwarted his stage adaptation of "To Kill a Mockingbird" (The Vulture).
I thanked [Tonja Carter, the executor of Harper Lee’s estate]... and told her how honored I was to be working on the material. I told her she was going to be part of a thrilling night in the theater. Then I told her that drama has rules, no less strict than the rules of music — 4/4 time requires four beats to a measure, the key of C-major prohibits sharps and flats, and a piece of music has to end on the tonic or the dominant. “The rules of drama,” I said, “were written down by Aristotle in the Poetics in 350 BC. These rules are four centuries older than Christianity. A protagonist— ” Yeah, we got nowhere.

Tonja Carter said to [the producer Scott Rudin] and me, “I think you both hate To Kill a Mockingbird” (which would explain the three years we spent working on it), and we faced the scary possibility that we weren’t going to be able to do the play. It’s not that we thought we were going to lose the case — the lawyers were confident we would win — it’s that Scott and his investors couldn’t go into a production under a cloud of litigation, and with every passing day we were getting closer to losing our theater to another show. Was it possible that a person could win a lawsuit just by filing it?
A faux naive question!

At one point Sorkin exclaims, “The play can’t be written by a team of lawyers." And though Sorkin kind of "wished we’d gone to court so I could hear a federal judge decide what imaginary people would and wouldn’t do," there wasn't money-wasting time for that, and the case was settled:
... I finally said, “If Tom Robinson and Calpurnia are taken off the table as issues, I’ll cut ‘Jesus Christ’ and ‘Goddamit,’ Atticus won’t have a rifle in his closet, and he won’t drink a glass of whiskey after the trial.”


Thus articles "If our defense rests on my ability to explain what a play is without sounding condescending, we’re completely screwed."

that is all articles "If our defense rests on my ability to explain what a play is without sounding condescending, we’re completely screwed." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "If our defense rests on my ability to explain what a play is without sounding condescending, we’re completely screwed." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2018/11/if-our-defense-rests-on-my-ability-to.html

Subscribe to receive free email updates:

0 Response to ""If our defense rests on my ability to explain what a play is without sounding condescending, we’re completely screwed.""

Post a Comment

Loading...