"Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face."
link : "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face."

"Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face."

A headline, on a WaPo column by Fred Hiatt, just one of many things I'm seeing this morning as I try to find some inroad into the story of Jamal Khashoggi.

Now, as more and more evidence implicates Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, in the reported murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi on Saudi diplomatic property in Istanbul, the equation has changed.

The "reported murder" is a strange way to say "suspected murder" or "alleged murder" and it makes me uneasy about fake news. The fact that something has been reported doesn't make it true unless journalism itself is a process that ensures truth. I remain confused.

Hiatt imagines a daughter asking "Daddy" about why he works for a murderer, which just seems like sententious blather. Hiatt goes on to paint Trump as unscrupulous and greedy, thinking only about the money we get from Saudi Arabia. The column is padded out with the moral struggled of the imagined "Daddy" and concludes "No matter what Saudi Arabia offered, could its supposed friendship be worth shrugging off the ensnaring and killing of a critic whose only offense was to tell the truth?"

I'm wary of the foreign policy as "friendship" rhetoric. I'm wary of test: Can Daddy explain it to his little girl? In this invented moral scenario, why are we using a parent and child and why have a male parent and a female child? I know you want to play on my heartstrings, but could you play something less babyish? Was Obama's foreign policy — say, with Iran or Syria — put through an explain-it-to-a-child test?

People criticize Trump as being a big child, but this criticism of Trump expects us all to think like children.

Thus articles "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face."

that is all articles "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article "Will you work for a murderer? That’s the question a host of ex-generals, diplomats and spies may soon face." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2018/10/will-you-work-for-murderer-thats.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: