Title : Should the U.S. Build And Buy Non-Nuclear Submarines?
link : Should the U.S. Build And Buy Non-Nuclear Submarines?
Should the U.S. Build And Buy Non-Nuclear Submarines?
The Virginia-class nuclear attack submarine USS Minnesota. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Steven Hoskins
Popular Mechanics: Should the U.S. Navy Buy Non-Nuclear Submarines?
Backers claim the Pentagon would get more bang for its buck, but the Navy disagrees.
It was 1990, and it was the end of an era. The U.S. Navy decommissioned the attack submarine USS Blueback, the last non-nuclear attack submarine in U.S. service.
Nuclear subs have distinct advantages over their conventionally-powered cousins, but they also take a long time and a lot of money to build. As China’s Navy ramps up, is it time for America’s shipyards to build diesel electric submarines again? A new article in The National Interest takes up this issue.
Read more ....
WNU Editor: You can buy 5 non-nuclear submarines for the price of one nuclear submarine. That alone makes it very tempting to maybe explore this option.
Thus articles Should the U.S. Build And Buy Non-Nuclear Submarines?
that is all articles Should the U.S. Build And Buy Non-Nuclear Submarines? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Should the U.S. Build And Buy Non-Nuclear Submarines? with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2018/09/should-us-build-and-buy-non-nuclear.html
0 Response to "Should the U.S. Build And Buy Non-Nuclear Submarines?"
Post a Comment