Title : "What is the point of arguing with Peter Strzok for ten hours about whether he was biased against Donald Trump?"
link : "What is the point of arguing with Peter Strzok for ten hours about whether he was biased against Donald Trump?"
"What is the point of arguing with Peter Strzok for ten hours about whether he was biased against Donald Trump?"
"The texts speak for themselves, illustrating beyond cavil that he was biased. In fact, his absurd caviling to the contrary suggests he’d be an easy witness to demolish if a competent examiner had the documentary ammunition. Bias is a dumb thing for Strzok to get uppity about. In 20 years of investigating people, I can’t tell you how many of them I developed a healthy bias against. Bias is a natural human condition. It is something we tend to feel about people who do bad things. There is, and there could be, no requirement that an investigator be impartial about the people he reasonably suspects of crimes. Am I supposed to be impartial about a terrorist? An anti-American spy? A corrupt politician? Seriously? The question is not whether the investigator is biased, but whether bias leads the investigator to do illegal or abusive things. In the case of Strzok and his colleagues, the questions are whether they applied different standards of justice to the two candidates they were investigating; whether, with respect to Trump in particular, they pursued a counterintelligence probe in the stretch-run of an election, premised on the belief that he was a traitor, based on information that was flimsy and unverified. These questions cannot be answered without the documents that explain the origin of the investigation. If the committees are not willing or able to hold government officials in contempt for stonewalling, and President Trump is not willing to order that his subordinates cooperate, it would be better to shut the investigations down than to further abide a farce."Writes Andrew McCarthy (National Review).
Thus articles "What is the point of arguing with Peter Strzok for ten hours about whether he was biased against Donald Trump?"
that is all articles "What is the point of arguing with Peter Strzok for ten hours about whether he was biased against Donald Trump?" This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "What is the point of arguing with Peter Strzok for ten hours about whether he was biased against Donald Trump?" with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2018/07/what-is-point-of-arguing-with-peter.html
0 Response to ""What is the point of arguing with Peter Strzok for ten hours about whether he was biased against Donald Trump?""
Post a Comment