Title : How far must I scroll into "Gina Haspel, Trump’s pick for CIA director, tied to use of brutal interrogation measures" before I see a picture of Gina Haspel?
link : How far must I scroll into "Gina Haspel, Trump’s pick for CIA director, tied to use of brutal interrogation measures" before I see a picture of Gina Haspel?
How far must I scroll into "Gina Haspel, Trump’s pick for CIA director, tied to use of brutal interrogation measures" before I see a picture of Gina Haspel?
My sexism detector is triggered by this Washington Post article. The first woman has been selected as the director of the CIA, and — let me put the "tied to use of brutal interrogation measures" part aside for a moment — the screen looks like this:
They ran a picture of the vacancy! They'd rather show nothing than a picture of a woman who is not the right kind of woman.
Behave, ladies, and you might win our approval.
Has a male appointee at this level ever been treated with such disregard? I'm thinking this is special for women. This is what happens to women when they don't adhere to the required politics. Be warned!
Scrolling down, the next image is:
Men. It's an article about Gina Haspel. Why am I seeing Trump and Tillerson?
Another screen's scroll downward and we finally get a picture of the woman, nudged over to the side:
Don't worry, Gina. The building will love you.
I'm complaining about the formatting of the page, not the choice to decline to do a dance of celebration for this female first. The story of the involvement in "harrowing interrogation measures widely condemned as torture" would, I assume, be told the same way for a male nominee, and it should therefore be told about the female nominee, even when she is a first. If you don't muck it up with insinuations that it's a perversion of femininity not to be caring, it's fine. Give us the facts:
Her extensive involvement in a covert program that used harrowing interrogation measures on al-Qaeda suspects resurfaced last year when she was named deputy director of the CIA.... Haspel ran one of the first CIA black sites, a compound in Thailand code-named “Cat’s Eye,” where al-Qaeda suspects Zayn al-Abidin Muhammed Hussein, better known as Abu Zubaida, and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri were subjected to waterboarding and other techniques in 2002....I wonder how many people think this background helps overcome concerns they'd otherwise have about a female CIA director. And I wonder how many people would impugn my womanhood for having said even that.
Haspel later served as chief of staff to the head of the agency’s Counterterrorism Center, Jose Rodriguez, when he ordered the destruction of dozens of videotapes made at the Thailand site. Rodriguez wrote in his memoir that Haspel “drafted a cable” ordering the tapes’ destruction in 2005 as the program came under mounting public scrutiny and that he then “took a deep breath of weary satisfaction and hit Send.”
Thus articles How far must I scroll into "Gina Haspel, Trump’s pick for CIA director, tied to use of brutal interrogation measures" before I see a picture of Gina Haspel?
that is all articles How far must I scroll into "Gina Haspel, Trump’s pick for CIA director, tied to use of brutal interrogation measures" before I see a picture of Gina Haspel? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article How far must I scroll into "Gina Haspel, Trump’s pick for CIA director, tied to use of brutal interrogation measures" before I see a picture of Gina Haspel? with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2018/03/how-far-must-i-scroll-into-gina-haspel.html
0 Response to "How far must I scroll into "Gina Haspel, Trump’s pick for CIA director, tied to use of brutal interrogation measures" before I see a picture of Gina Haspel?"
Post a Comment