Title : Must we talk about Hillary? Steve Wynn is worse. He's more like Harvey Weinstein.
link : Must we talk about Hillary? Steve Wynn is worse. He's more like Harvey Weinstein.
Must we talk about Hillary? Steve Wynn is worse. He's more like Harvey Weinstein.
The question of Hillary Clinton and sexual harassment came up on "Meet the Press" this morning. The moderator Chuck Todd began with a question based on the Ruth Marcus column I linked to — here — earlier this morning.CHUCK TODD: All right. There was the reckoning, I guess is probably the best way to describe it, the reckoning. Right? We have a reckoning at the U.S.A. Gymnastics. Reckoning with the U.S. Olympic committee, that in itself. But then there's been more reckoning with Hillary Clinton, a little bit the story in the Times that in 2008 her campaign that somebody was accused of sexual harassment. Campaign manager wanted to fire this person. Hillary Clinton stepped in and said no. Ruth Marcus today just eviscerates Hillary Clinton on this and, Heather, says, "Why can't she admit that that was a mistake?How unfortunate for Hillary to have her story break at the same time as the truly nightmarish gymnastics story! And yet I feel no pity for her. In my view, her behavior protecting Bill Clinton and suppressing his accusers set the sexual harassment cause back 20 years.
Todd's question goes to Heather McGhee, president of the liberal group Demos. Look how quickly she changes the subject:
HEATHER MCGHEE: I think that you're right. I think that Ruth Marcus is right that she should have just admitted that it was a mistake. Hillary Clinton has a very difficult history with men in power abusing their positions in terms of sexual abuse and harassment. I think that our desire to bring Hillary Clinton continually into the story is understandable. I think the bigger story right now is obviously what's going on in the U.S. Olympic committee. I think the Steve Wynn story is a huge one in terms of finance share of the RNC. And some of those stories are terrifying....So, Hillary Clinton's "history" is "difficult," and we just have a problem — albeit an "understandable" one — of "continually" dragging Hillary Clinton into the story! News just broke about the sexual harasser she kept on her campaign. We're not obsessively going back to her old misdeeds.
But Todd lets McGhee shift to the other new story, Steve Wynn. He even muses: "Steve Wynn feels like the closest thing we've gotten to Harvey Weinstein. Like almost as bad as Harvey." McGhee is all: "Worse in some ways." And Todd prattles: "It is. Harvey I thought is in a class by himself I think. But Steve Wynn was pretty close."
Like it's a contest of who's more loathsome. But Nasser, the Olympics doctor alluded to earlier, is obviously the most loathsome of all. He's forgotten at this point however because what McGhee and Todd are really talking about is whether "we've" finally gotten a Republican who's as bad as the Democrat Weinstein.
Thus articles Must we talk about Hillary? Steve Wynn is worse. He's more like Harvey Weinstein.
that is all articles Must we talk about Hillary? Steve Wynn is worse. He's more like Harvey Weinstein. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Must we talk about Hillary? Steve Wynn is worse. He's more like Harvey Weinstein. with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2018/01/must-we-talk-about-hillary-steve-wynn.html
0 Response to "Must we talk about Hillary? Steve Wynn is worse. He's more like Harvey Weinstein."
Post a Comment