Title : "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad."
link : "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad."
"The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad."
"There are plenty of problems with the NFL right now, but many of them are either intractable or downright unfixable. The catch rule is not one of them. The NFL has to fix it, and that might require a totally radical sort of solution. Let's make arguments for three very different types of changes to the much-hated catch rule...."From "Three options to fix the NFL's catch rule" (ESPN), about this play in last nights Patriots/Steelers game.
ADDED: I guess if I've got a post with the words "There are plenty of problems with the NFL right now," I need to drop a link to "Sources: Jerry Richardson, Panthers Have Made Multiple Confidential Payouts for Workplace Misconduct, Including Sexual Harassment and Use of a Racial Slur" (Sports Illustrated) and "Diddy wants to buy the Panthers and sign Colin Kaepernick" (WaPo).
Thus articles "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad."
that is all articles "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-rule-was-interpreted-correctly-but.html
0 Response to ""The rule was interpreted correctly, but the rule is bad.""
Post a Comment