The NYT decides, "based on individual circumstances," that not firing Glenn Thrusn is "an appropriate response." - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title The NYT decides, "based on individual circumstances," that not firing Glenn Thrusn is "an appropriate response.", we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : The NYT decides, "based on individual circumstances," that not firing Glenn Thrusn is "an appropriate response."
link : The NYT decides, "based on individual circumstances," that not firing Glenn Thrusn is "an appropriate response."

The NYT decides, "based on individual circumstances," that not firing Glenn Thrusn is "an appropriate response."

I'm finally forcing myself to read "Glenn Thrush, Suspended Times Reporter, to Resume Work but Won’t Cover White House" (at the NYT).

The New York Times said on Wednesday that Glenn Thrush, one of the paper’s most prominent political reporters, would remain suspended until late January and then be removed from the team covering the White House after he faced allegations of inappropriate sexual behavior....

[Dean Baquet, the executive editor] said Mr. Thrush was undergoing counseling and substance abuse rehabilitation on his own and that he would receive training “to improve his workplace conduct.”

“We understand that our colleagues and the public at large are grappling with what constitutes sexually offensive behavior in the workplace and what consequences are appropriate,” Mr. Baquet added. “Each case has to be evaluated based on individual circumstances. We believe this is an appropriate response to Glenn’s situation.”

I agree with that statement at the high level of abstraction where it is made, but it's a high-level-abstraction statement about how decisions should be made at a low level of abstraction, looking at the individual particularities. What confidence do I have that the NYT has any standards at all and that they will be applied fairly and consistently?

I'm looking at the specific factors without seeing analysis of what exactly was key. There was an article (in Vox) containing accusations by 4 women, only one of whom was named. The women said Thrush subjected them to "unwanted kissing and touching."

Three of the women described encounters that occurred when Mr. Thrush was working at Politico. One described an incident that occurred in June. None of the women cited in the article worked at The Times.

So... is it the totality of the circumstances, considering all the factors including the number of alleged incidents, the severity of the alleged actions, when they took place, whether the alleged victims are employees of the same company, how important the accused is to the employer, and the submission to counseling? Is that what the NYT is doing and what the NYT would recommend to other employers dealing with sexual harassment cases?

Thus articles The NYT decides, "based on individual circumstances," that not firing Glenn Thrusn is "an appropriate response."

that is all articles The NYT decides, "based on individual circumstances," that not firing Glenn Thrusn is "an appropriate response." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article The NYT decides, "based on individual circumstances," that not firing Glenn Thrusn is "an appropriate response." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/12/the-nyt-decides-based-on-individual.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: