If you can get that wrong, what are the chances you're getting the actually difficult stuff right? - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title If you can get that wrong, what are the chances you're getting the actually difficult stuff right?, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : If you can get that wrong, what are the chances you're getting the actually difficult stuff right?
link : If you can get that wrong, what are the chances you're getting the actually difficult stuff right?

If you can get that wrong, what are the chances you're getting the actually difficult stuff right?

A correction on an article titled "A Surprise From the Supervolcano Under Yellowstone" in the NYT "Science" section:

An earlier version of a home page headline for this article misstated the location of a supervolcano that drives geological activity. It is beneath Yellowstone National Park, not Yosemite.

The article went up yesterday, and the correction is dated today.

Meanwhile, on the subject of the NYT and science, there's an editorial with the headline: "Mr. Trump Nails Shut the Coffin on Climate Relief." It's just such an offputtingly dramatic title. I understand that they mean that relief from climate change is dead, but death is not enough. It had to be "nails shut the coffin." Yeah, coffin metaphors seem scary — and perhaps seasonally apt (near Halloween) — but there's nothing that's a metaphorical body inside the coffin. Relief is an abstraction. And "climate relief" doesn't even make sense. We will always have a climate. We just have preferences about what kind of climate we like best.

Sorry, I'm just complaining about a headline. The editorial itself says "climate change." And it doesn't mention a coffin. It says "dead." Here:

In March Mr. Trump ordered Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, to repeal the Clean Power Plan, which was aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants. Mr. Pruitt, a climate denier closely tied to the fossil fuel industry, was only too happy to oblige — boasting to an audience of Kentucky coal miners on Monday that the plan was dead and that “the war on coal is over."

So what's dead — ironically — is a war.  "War" was a metaphor, the other side's metaphor.

Kill war. That sounds like a slogan on a 1960s placard. But I don't think I've seen that slogan. I've seen "Killing for peace is like screwing for virginity."

Thus articles If you can get that wrong, what are the chances you're getting the actually difficult stuff right?

that is all articles If you can get that wrong, what are the chances you're getting the actually difficult stuff right? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article If you can get that wrong, what are the chances you're getting the actually difficult stuff right? with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/10/if-you-can-get-that-wrong-what-are.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: