Title : "Why Hurricane Irma wasn’t far worse, and how close it came to catastrophe."
link : "Why Hurricane Irma wasn’t far worse, and how close it came to catastrophe."
"Why Hurricane Irma wasn’t far worse, and how close it came to catastrophe."
That headline at The Washington Post makes me think about all the headlines, as the hurricane was approaching, about how the hurricane is worse because of climate change. If if wasn't worse, was that because the earlier talk about the effect of climate change was exaggerated?The only mention of climate change in the article is in the blurb about the author: "Jason [Samenow] is the Washington Post’s weather editor and Capital Weather Gang's chief meteorologist. He earned a master's degree in atmospheric science, and spent 10 years as a climate change science analyst for the U.S. government."
The article is about luck and happenstance — "shifts and wobbles." And I can't help feeling suspicious that if the hurricane had bounced into more damaging locations, it would be framed in terms of climate change.
Thus articles "Why Hurricane Irma wasn’t far worse, and how close it came to catastrophe."
that is all articles "Why Hurricane Irma wasn’t far worse, and how close it came to catastrophe." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "Why Hurricane Irma wasn’t far worse, and how close it came to catastrophe." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/09/why-hurricane-irma-wasnt-far-worse-and.html
0 Response to ""Why Hurricane Irma wasn’t far worse, and how close it came to catastrophe.""
Post a Comment