Title : "It’s gotten ridiculous. Everybody believes they can be the person who will stack up great against Trump."
link : "It’s gotten ridiculous. Everybody believes they can be the person who will stack up great against Trump."
"It’s gotten ridiculous. Everybody believes they can be the person who will stack up great against Trump."
"I tell them all that it’s way too early, and that they need a clearer message about what they want to do, not just about opposing Trump."Said Marc Lasr, a Wall Street billionaire who is used to contributing to Democratic Party candidates who start hitting him up 2 years before a presidential election, quoted in "Long List of Top Democrats Have 2020, and Money, on Their Minds" in the NYT. I don't know if he's right — that a 2020 candidate should craft a clear message this early — but I can understand resisting giving money to people if all they're really saying is that they will beat Trump. That's something that's dangerously easy to believe, but you saw what happened in 2016.
I'm trying to read between the lines and figure out what's going on with fundraising for 2020. There's no mention of Zuckerberg, who doesn't need to raise money to compete. And look at this:
Mrs. Clinton’s successor in the Senate, Kirsten E. Gillibrand, has paid more than $1 million this year through her political committees to a top online fund-raising firm, which has helped her reap $2.3 million this year in small donations for a 2018 re-election race in which she is the heavy favorite...."Reap" suggests a bountiful harvest, but is that a good return? You give up $1 million that you took all the trouble to raise and you hire a "top... fund-raising firm" and all you net is $1.3 million? Do you then take $1 million of that to pay for the next round of fund-raising?! Are people just fund-raising to pay for fund-raising?
Why doesn't this article have a darker or more frantic tone? The first sentence is: "Aides to Senator Kamala Harris of California say that her fund-raisers in Martha’s Vineyard and the Hamptons this summer have been all about helping Democrats in 2018." I feel as though they're trying to distract us with amusement at the coyness of someone who's not yet openly declared her candidacy, but what jumps out at me is here we go again with Martha’s Vineyard and the Hamptons.
Thus articles "It’s gotten ridiculous. Everybody believes they can be the person who will stack up great against Trump."
that is all articles "It’s gotten ridiculous. Everybody believes they can be the person who will stack up great against Trump." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "It’s gotten ridiculous. Everybody believes they can be the person who will stack up great against Trump." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/09/its-gotten-ridiculous-everybody.html
Related Posts :
The NYT tells its readers about the woes of life in a "tiny home" during the lockdown...- "Senators, America we need to exercise our common sense about what happened.... Let's not get caught up in a lot of outlandish lawyers theories here. Exercise your common sense about what just took place in our country."
- At the Still Too Cold Café...
- "Some owners even chose to be buried at the pet cemetery, since they could not be buried alongside their pets at human cemeteries..."
- The defense lawyers contended that Democrats were pursuing Mr. Trump out of personal and partisan animosity, using the word 'hatred' 15 times during their formal presentation..."
0 Response to ""It’s gotten ridiculous. Everybody believes they can be the person who will stack up great against Trump.""
Post a Comment