Title : "After the election, I made a comment that I thought the idea misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election was a crazy idea."
link : "After the election, I made a comment that I thought the idea misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election was a crazy idea."
"After the election, I made a comment that I thought the idea misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election was a crazy idea."
"Calling that crazy was dismissive and I regret it. This is too important an issue to be dismissive. But the data we have has always shown that our broader impact -- from giving people a voice to enabling candidates to communicate directly to helping millions of people vote -- played a far bigger role in this election. We will continue to work to build a community for all people. We will do our part to defend against nation states attempting to spread misinformation and subvert elections. We'll keep working to ensure the integrity of free and fair elections around the world, and to ensure our community is a platform for all ideas and force for good in democracy."Writes Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook, receiving and defending against and proving the effectiveness of the hit he took from Donald Trump yesterday. Zuckerberg doesn't link to or embed the tweet. It was this:
Facebook was always anti-Trump.The Networks were always anti-Trump hence,Fake News, @nytimes(apologized) & @WaPo were anti-Trump. Collusion?— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 27, 2017
Whether Facebook was really anti-Trump, it was useful to Trump to push it back in Twitterish simplicity because he has so many powerful antagonists who are leaning on Facebook to sacrifice whatever ideals of neutrality and freedom of speech that it may have. I hope Facebook solidifies, preserves, and extends its neutrality and freedom values, and with that end in mind, I appreciate what I think is the effectiveness of Trump's absurdly abrupt tweets.
The question "Collusion?" is very funny, because "collusion" is a key word in the muck of charges about the Russian influence on the campaign. So a free-wheeling "collusion" suspicion works as a satire of the Russia-related collusion talk. And it makes us wonder, what's so bad about collusion? Are these different sets of people not supposed to act in pursuit of the same goal, not supposed to talk with each other at all, not supposed to notice what each other is doing and figure out how to do things that coordinate?
Thus articles "After the election, I made a comment that I thought the idea misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election was a crazy idea."
that is all articles "After the election, I made a comment that I thought the idea misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election was a crazy idea." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "After the election, I made a comment that I thought the idea misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election was a crazy idea." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/09/after-election-i-made-comment-that-i.html
Related Posts :
Theresa May and the Tories are the ones with the serious anti-Semitsm problem
Russian Warships Off Syrian Coast Raises Pentagon Concerns
Turkey Builds Up Its Military Forces In Northern Syria On The Anticipation Of An All-Out Assault By Syrian And Russian Forces Against Syrian Rebels In Idlib Province
Pentagon Has Rejected A U.S. State Department Request To Deploy U.S. Marines To Taiwan To Guard The De Facto American Ambassy there
Inter-Korean Liaison Office Opens Today That Will Allow 24-Hour Contact Between The Two Koreas
0 Response to ""After the election, I made a comment that I thought the idea misinformation on Facebook changed the outcome of the election was a crazy idea.""
Post a Comment