Title : "But the Trump administration doesn’t need to accept that climate change will make rodent infestations worse to step in and save the cities from their rats...."
link : "But the Trump administration doesn’t need to accept that climate change will make rodent infestations worse to step in and save the cities from their rats...."
"But the Trump administration doesn’t need to accept that climate change will make rodent infestations worse to step in and save the cities from their rats...."
"Maybe the best way to get Trump’s attention and sell him on reviving the Urban Rat Control grant program is to stress that there is glory to be had, and for relatively cheap. 'Rats are very incredible, wildly intelligent mammals, and human beings keep going around trying to exterminate [them] as if it’s the opposite,' [rodentologist Bobby] Corrigan said. “These cities are up against one of the most incredible mammals on the planet, which only stand to increase in number.' For a mere $13 million (plus inflation), Trump could stop the ratpocalypse before it begins."From "America Is on the Verge of Ratpocalypse/Warmer weather is fueling a rodent surge, straining public health systems and the economy. It's time for the federal government to step in" (in The New Republic).
The article frets that Trump may resist rat control because the "ratpocalypse" alarm has to do with global warming. The part I quoted above is an effort at a different pitch, which seems to be an effort to appeal to Trump's vanity, with rats presented as a formidable enemy that he might feel pride in stepping up and fighting.
You don't really have to try that hard. Trump has made "fixing the inner cities" a core promise:
"I’ll tell you, we’re spending a lot of money on the inner cities. We’re fixing the inner cities. We’re doing far more than anybody’s done with respect to the inner cities. It’s a priority for me. And it’s very important."That's a quote from a few days ago. I cut and pasted it from "President Trump’s claim that he has done ‘far more than anyone’ for ‘inner cities’" at The Washington Post's "Fact Checker" — which gives the statement 4 Pinocchios.
Thus articles "But the Trump administration doesn’t need to accept that climate change will make rodent infestations worse to step in and save the cities from their rats...."
that is all articles "But the Trump administration doesn’t need to accept that climate change will make rodent infestations worse to step in and save the cities from their rats...." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "But the Trump administration doesn’t need to accept that climate change will make rodent infestations worse to step in and save the cities from their rats...." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/08/but-trump-administration-doesnt-need-to.html
0 Response to ""But the Trump administration doesn’t need to accept that climate change will make rodent infestations worse to step in and save the cities from their rats....""
Post a Comment