Title : Slate must think the word "male" in this headline makes it not just okay but hilarious.
link : Slate must think the word "male" in this headline makes it not just okay but hilarious.
Slate must think the word "male" in this headline makes it not just okay but hilarious.
Oh, no! I'm wrong. I clicked through from the front page, above, and the article looks like this:
Wow. I'm surprised. It begins:
There’s a certain class of public figure whose face routinely gets described as “punchable.” He’s usually male; though arguably society shouldn’t be encouraging the punching of anyone (with possible exception for Nazis), good etiquette would seem to indicate that women are considered the less punchable sex. The guy with the punchable face is usually white; it’s hard out there for white men lately, in case you hadn’t heard. He’s usually young, too: What’s more annoying the know-it-all grin of impetuous youth? In addition to the privilege that being young, white, and male already affords him, he of high punchability often has a look that somehow scans as extra-privileged, a mouth seemingly born with a silver spoon in it....Is this the way we're talking now? It seems so wrong, and yet I admit that in private speech, I do sometimes say "I just want to smack that guy." Smacking is less violent than punching, but it shows that I've got the hang of this metaphor.
Is Trump mentioned in this article? (The question occurs to me because I'm thinking about Trump retweeting that CNN wrestling video, which some people found funny and comprehensible as metaphor and some people deplored as encouraging violence against journalists (if only in the mind of the mentally deranged).) Donald Trump isn't mentioned in the article, but both of his sons — not just the much bloodied Don Jr. but the other one, Eric — are presented as most squarely within this concept of punchable, along with 5 other men: Martin Shkreli, Scott Disick, Ryan Lochte, Miles Teller, and Justin Bieber.
[O]bviously the Trump sons are beady-eyed paragons of smugness. There is a relationship, then, between punchability and self-knowledge. Misbehaving so badly when they have the advantages that they do is what tends to raise the public’s hackles. Can they all be so blithely unaware of the tiredness of the “bad boy” trope, or the many overgrown babies who have already trod this ground? And yet they continue to smirk.
Thus articles Slate must think the word "male" in this headline makes it not just okay but hilarious.
that is all articles Slate must think the word "male" in this headline makes it not just okay but hilarious. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Slate must think the word "male" in this headline makes it not just okay but hilarious. with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/07/slate-must-think-word-male-in-this.html
Related Posts :
"Now Henderson, a single mom in Blairsville, Georgia, is facing criminal reckless conduct charges for letting her 14-year-old babysit."
"I'm awake! My fellow geraniums, our nation's in crisis...."- "I think we’ll get a vote from Republican side for the following reason: I’m not looking to make an ideological choice here."
- 34 of 38Harvard faculty members who signed a letter supporting Professor John L. Comaroff have signed a retraction letter saying they "failed to appreciate the impact" their letter would have.
Is the requirement that barristers wear wigs — perukes — racially discriminatory or maybe just fashion nonsense?
0 Response to "Slate must think the word "male" in this headline makes it not just okay but hilarious."
Post a Comment