Title : NYT headline: "Soviet Veteran Who Met With Trump Jr. Is a Master of the Dark Arts."
link : NYT headline: "Soviet Veteran Who Met With Trump Jr. Is a Master of the Dark Arts."
NYT headline: "Soviet Veteran Who Met With Trump Jr. Is a Master of the Dark Arts."
The article is about Rinat Akhmetshin, a Russian-American lobbyist.What are the "dark arts" and how is he "a master"?
According to the first paragraph, Akhmetshin has often told journalists not to use email to send information that you want kept secret. That's something everyone should know though, right? That can't rate the "dark art" label? Just because someone as smart as Hillary Clinton didn't seem to know something doesn't mean it's ultra-sophisticated knowledge. It's something everyone functioning in the modern world ought to know.
A little further down, we see that Akhmetshin has done a lot of "opposition research" — he "was a skilled practitioner in the muscular Russian version of what in American politics is known as opposition research." Does it become a "dark art" because it's "muscular" and "Russian" and he's "skilled"? Opposition research is a normal part of American politics. What's "dark" about his "version" of it?
The article says that in Russia, opposition research uses "stolen or fabricated documents," "pilfering private information through hacking and physical intrusion into offices and filing cabinets." I think we have that in America too. And I'm not seeing Akhmetshin accused of doing any stealing or fabricating, only that he "has acquired a reputation for obtaining" these things. Again, is that unusual? The NYT is famous for publishing the Pentagon Papers. Is it practicing a "dark art" when it "obtains" information other people have broken the law to get?
Very well into the article we get this (boldface added):
There is no evidence that Mr. Akhmetshin’s efforts on behalf of any of his clients, whether they had close or hostile relations with the Kremlin, were illegal. Nor is there evidence that he personally engaged in the technical aspects of hacking himself....Maybe he's so good at the "dark arts" that he leaves no evidence. Anyway, I'm disturbed by the headline and the straining to tar this man.
And I do understand that the phrase "dark arts" is used in the area of spying. For example, from 2013 (in ZDNet): "GCHQ's dark arts: Leaked documents reveal online manipulation, Facebook, YouTube snooping/A fresh set of documents leaked by Edward Snowden show how the UK intelligence agency can manipulate online polls and debates, spread messages, snoop on YouTube and track Facebook users."
But I'm uneasy and skeptical when I see this term used in a headline and the definition and support for it are not apparent. It's as if journalism is some sort of... dark art.
Thus articles NYT headline: "Soviet Veteran Who Met With Trump Jr. Is a Master of the Dark Arts."
that is all articles NYT headline: "Soviet Veteran Who Met With Trump Jr. Is a Master of the Dark Arts." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article NYT headline: "Soviet Veteran Who Met With Trump Jr. Is a Master of the Dark Arts." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/07/nyt-headline-soviet-veteran-who-met.html
Related Posts :
"It might be most helpful to compare a social network to a party. The party starts out small, with the hosts and a few of their friends."
"President Trump Hosts the 2017 World Series Champion Houston Astros."
Why is Tory MP Greg Hands such a liar?
Betsy DeVos Is Every Stupid Teacher You Ever Had (Except Way Richer)- At the Cruddy Troll Café...
0 Response to "NYT headline: "Soviet Veteran Who Met With Trump Jr. Is a Master of the Dark Arts.""
Post a Comment