Title : When the NYT forgets about the Establishment Clause and public education.
link : When the NYT forgets about the Establishment Clause and public education.
When the NYT forgets about the Establishment Clause and public education.
I was stunned at something in the article "Climate Science Meets a Stubborn Obstacle: Students," which focuses on an Ohio public school teacher, James Sutter, who's having trouble getting his lesson across to a student named Gwen Beatty, who, we're told, is a straight-A student.When she insisted that teachers “are supposed to be open to opinions,” however, Mr. Sutter held his ground.A public school teacher chose a video for the purpose of presenting an argument based on Christianity?! It's supposed to be a science class. It's not a class about the history of religion or comparative religion. The teacher introducing religious material for the purpose of bolstering a scientific conclusion.
“It’s not about opinions,” he told her. “It’s about the evidence.”
“It’s like you can’t disagree with a scientist or you’re ‘denying science,”’ she sniffed to her friends.
Gwen, 17, could not put her finger on why she found Mr. Sutter, whose biology class she had enjoyed, suddenly so insufferable. Mr. Sutter, sensing that his facts and figures were not helping, was at a loss. And the day she grew so agitated by a documentary he was showing that she bolted out of the school left them both shaken.
“I have a runner,” Mr. Sutter called down to the office, switching off the video.
He had chosen the video, an episode from an Emmy-winning series that featured a Christian climate activist and high production values, as a counterpoint to another of Gwen’s objections, that a belief in climate change does not jibe with Christianity.
“It was just so biased toward saying climate change is real,” she said later, trying to explain her flight. “And that all these people that I pretty much am like are wrong and stupid.”
Here's the video. It's almost an hour long, and I haven't watched it yet.
I don't know how much religion is in the video, and I'm not giving a legal opinion on whether the teacher violated the Establishment Clause. We can discuss that. I just want to call out the New York Times for its inattention to the Establishment Clause, which it usually expects its readers to take very seriously, especially in the context of educating children.
It makes me suspect that those who are demanding that we believe in climate change really are operating in a religion mode and that does not inspire confidence in science.
And, really, why is it so important for Gwen to believe in climate change? She has an active and inquisitive mind. Why not feed it and support it and empower her to go where she sees fit? Bullying her with demands for belief — even without the religion larded in — isn't likely to inspire her to take on a STEM career.
I'd like to read the comments on this NYT article, but — despite the paper's new reliance on comments in lieu of a Public Editor — comments are not enabled for this one.
Thus articles When the NYT forgets about the Establishment Clause and public education.
that is all articles When the NYT forgets about the Establishment Clause and public education. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article When the NYT forgets about the Establishment Clause and public education. with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/06/when-nyt-forgets-about-establishment.html
0 Response to "When the NYT forgets about the Establishment Clause and public education."
Post a Comment