What "three separate occasions" was Trump referring to when he said that Comey had told him that he was not under investigation? - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title What "three separate occasions" was Trump referring to when he said that Comey had told him that he was not under investigation?, we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : What "three separate occasions" was Trump referring to when he said that Comey had told him that he was not under investigation?
link : What "three separate occasions" was Trump referring to when he said that Comey had told him that he was not under investigation?

What "three separate occasions" was Trump referring to when he said that Comey had told him that he was not under investigation?

Here's Comey's friend Benjamin Witte explaining why he finds it "simply inconceivable to me that Comey would tell the President that." That is, he doesn't know, but he tries to imagine what Comey could have done, and he just can't.



Witte says "it would have been lunacy for Comey to assure the President that his conduct was not ultimately a matter of scrutiny in at least some of the investigative threads the FBI had—and has—ongoing." Lunacy? But perhaps Comey is a lunatic? Witte — conceding that Trump has said Comey is "a nut job" — assures us: "Comey is not, in fact, a lunatic."

Witte says it would be "completely inappropriate and irresponsible" for Comey to have assured the President he's not under investigation, and Comey is a man of dedication and integrity. Therefore, he couldn't have done it.

Finally, Witte says that Comey cared about the independence of the FBI, and therefore it's "inconceivable" that Comey would do anything other than resisting encroachments by the President.

Now, Witte concedes that something must have been said that makes Trump think he can make his "three times" statement. But what? Witte concedes that "there’s actually nothing unusual about a person who is wrapped up in a white collar investigation inquiring about his status within it." Often, Witte tells us, the Justice Department will tell people whether they are “witness,” a “subject,” or a “target.” Witte "wouldn’t be surprised at all" if Trump asked about his status and got an answer from Comey. So that's completely conceivable, and Witte's complaint dwindles down into an argument about what it means to be "under investigation."

Witte concedes that Trump might have asked "Am I under investigation?" and Comey might have answered "You are not currently the target of any investigation." Trump might have inaccurately paraphrased that statement to "not under investigation." It's not that different from the way Witte paraphrases "not under investigation" as "not ultimately a matter of scrutiny in at least some of the investigative threads the FBI had."

Thus articles What "three separate occasions" was Trump referring to when he said that Comey had told him that he was not under investigation?

that is all articles What "three separate occasions" was Trump referring to when he said that Comey had told him that he was not under investigation? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article What "three separate occasions" was Trump referring to when he said that Comey had told him that he was not under investigation? with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/05/what-three-separate-occasions-was-trump.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: