Title : "There’s a certain kind of personal essay that, for a long time, everybody seemed to hate. These essays were mostly written by women."
link : "There’s a certain kind of personal essay that, for a long time, everybody seemed to hate. These essays were mostly written by women."
"There’s a certain kind of personal essay that, for a long time, everybody seemed to hate. These essays were mostly written by women."
"They came off as unseemly, the writer’s judgment as flawed. They were too personal: the topics seemed insignificant, or else too important to be aired for an audience of strangers. The essays that drew the most attention tended to fall within certain categories. There were the one-off body-horror pieces, such as 'My Gynecologist Found a Ball of Cat Hair in My Vagina,' published by xoJane, or a notorious lost-tampon chronicle published by Jezebel. There were essays that incited outrage for the life styles they described, like the one about pretending to live in the Victorian era, or Cat Marnell’s oeuvre. There were those that incited outrage by giving voice to horrible, uncharitable thoughts, like 'My Former Friend’s Death Was a Blessing' (xoJane again) and 'I’m Not Going to Pretend I’m Poor to Be Accepted by You' (Thought Catalog). Finally, there were those essays that directed outrage at society by describing incidents of sexism, abuse, or rape."So begins "The Personal-Essay Boom Is Over," by Jia Tolentino (in The New Yorker). Tolentino discusses the rise and fall of these overly personal essays. One element of the story — of every story, really — is Trump. It's not that gynecologists are finding Trump's hair in vaginas, but the topics of "relationships, self-image, intimate struggle" seemed noticeably lacking in "broader social relevance." As the editor of the Awl and the Hairpin put it: "I want to encourage people to talk about mostly anything other than themselves."
Put simply, the personal is no longer political in quite the same way that it was. Many profiles of Trump voters positioned personal stories as explanations for a terrible collective act; meanwhile, Clinton’s purported reliance on identity politics has been heavily criticized. Individual perspectives do not, at the moment, seem like a trustworthy way to get to the bottom of a subject.... Writers seem less interested in mustering their own centrality than they were, and readers seem less excited at the prospect of being irritated by individual civilian personalities....So now Trump is to blame for inhibiting the personal expression of women. That awful man!
No more lost-tampon essays, in other words, in the age of Donald Trump....
Thus articles "There’s a certain kind of personal essay that, for a long time, everybody seemed to hate. These essays were mostly written by women."
that is all articles "There’s a certain kind of personal essay that, for a long time, everybody seemed to hate. These essays were mostly written by women." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "There’s a certain kind of personal essay that, for a long time, everybody seemed to hate. These essays were mostly written by women." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/05/theres-certain-kind-of-personal-essay.html
0 Response to ""There’s a certain kind of personal essay that, for a long time, everybody seemed to hate. These essays were mostly written by women.""
Post a Comment