The plagiarism charge against Gorsuch. - Hallo friend USA IN NEWS, In the article you read this time with the title The plagiarism charge against Gorsuch., we have prepared well for this article you read and download the information therein. hopefully fill posts Article HOT, Article NEWS, we write this you can understand. Well, happy reading.

Title : The plagiarism charge against Gorsuch.
link : The plagiarism charge against Gorsuch.

The plagiarism charge against Gorsuch.

Read the details here (at Politico).

The words in question are stating the facts of a legal case — medical details. I have a feeling lawyers, law professors, and judges take shortcuts lifting this sort of detail from legal cases and briefs all the time. We're not seeing Gorsuch lifting any distinctive ideas from the author and not giving her credit. It's material about, for example, what "esophageal atresia with tracheosophageal fistula" means, and Gorsuch, like the other author, cited a 1982 Indiana court ruling — which we can't look at now because it's sealed — a pediatrics textbook titled “Rudolph’s Pediatrics,” and an article that appeared in the Bloomington Sunday Herald in 1983.

Should I have put the words after "cited" in quotes? I copied and pasted "A 1982 Indiana court ruling that was later sealed, a well-known pediatrics textbook, 'Rudolph’s Pediatrics,' and a 1983 article in the Bloomington Sunday Herald." And I changed the words a little.

If Althouse hadn't called attention to what she did, would you consider it plagiarism?

Yes. She totally used it and just made some feeble effort to change it to avoid giving credit.

Not plagiarism, but that's a shoddy way to write that deserves criticism.

Okay since the link shows where she got the info and we can see she didn't do independent research.

It's fine. Passing along facts like this is a convenience we should feel free to take advantage of even without the link to the source.

 

pollcode.com free polls

If you voted on that, now vote on this:

Was your vote influenced by your preference about whether Gorsuch should be confirmed?

No. I'm for Gorsuch and I took a negative position about what he did.

No. I'm against Gorsuch and I took a positive position about what he did.

No. My view only happened to match up with what I hope happens to Gorsuch.

No. My position shouldn't be characterized as "negative" or "positive." It was a neutral interpretation of the meaning of words, a dignified, thoughtful judgment that should not be impugned.

Yes. You got me, Althouse. I confess!

 

pollcode.com free polls

Thus articles The plagiarism charge against Gorsuch.

that is all articles The plagiarism charge against Gorsuch. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.

You now read the article The plagiarism charge against Gorsuch. with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/04/the-plagiarism-charge-against-gorsuch.html

Tweet

Subscribe to receive free email updates: