Title : "Journalists should recalibrate themselves to be more skeptical of the consensus of their peers."
link : "Journalists should recalibrate themselves to be more skeptical of the consensus of their peers."
"Journalists should recalibrate themselves to be more skeptical of the consensus of their peers."
"That’s because a position that seems to have deep backing from the evidence may really just be a reflection from the echo chamber. You should be looking toward how much evidence there is for a particular position as opposed to how many people hold that position: Having 20 independent pieces of evidence that mostly point in the same direction might indeed reflect a powerful consensus, while having 20 like-minded people citing the same warmed-over evidence is much less powerful... [T]he conventional wisdom can congeal so quickly — and yet has so often been wrong — a certain amount of contrarianism can go a long way."Writes Nate Silver in "There Really Was A Liberal Media Bubble/Groupthink produced a failure of the 'wisdom of crowds' and an underestimate of Trump’s chances."
(The point he's making is so ridiculously obvious that the length and seriousness of this piece is evidence of the pathetic dilapidation of the press.)
Thus articles "Journalists should recalibrate themselves to be more skeptical of the consensus of their peers."
that is all articles "Journalists should recalibrate themselves to be more skeptical of the consensus of their peers." This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article "Journalists should recalibrate themselves to be more skeptical of the consensus of their peers." with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/03/journalists-should-recalibrate.html
0 Response to ""Journalists should recalibrate themselves to be more skeptical of the consensus of their peers.""
Post a Comment