Title : Excerpt from the new Supreme Court opinion about the copyrightability of a cheerleader's uniforms.
link : Excerpt from the new Supreme Court opinion about the copyrightability of a cheerleader's uniforms.
Excerpt from the new Supreme Court opinion about the copyrightability of a cheerleader's uniforms.
Breyer dissented, if that helps.
Here's another excerpt:
... Van Gogh’s painting of a pair of old shoes, though beautifully executed and copyrightable as a painting, would not qualify for a shoe design copyright... Courts have similarly denied copyright protection to obects that begin as three-dimensional designs, such as measuring spoons shaped like heart-tipped arrows, candleholders shaped like sailboats, and wire spokes on a wheel cover. None of these designs could qualify for copyright protection that would prevent others from selling spoons, candleholders, or wheel covers with the same design. Why not? Because in each case the design is not separable from the utilitarian aspects of the object to which it relates.... [S]poons, candleholders, and wheel covers are useful objects, as are the old shoes depicted in Van Gogh’s painting....
[A] copyright on Van Gogh’s painting would prevent others from reproducing that painting, but it would not prevent others from reproducing and selling the comfortable old shoes that the painting depicts...
Consider Marcel Duchamp’s “ready-mades” series, the functional mass-produced objects he designated as art.... What design features could not be imaginatively reproduced on a painter’s canvas? Indeed, great industrial design may well include design that is inseparable from the useful article—where, as Frank Lloyd Wright put it, “form and function are one.”... Where they are one, the designer may be able to obtain 15 years of protection through a design patent.... But, if they are one, Congress did not intend a century or more of copyright protection....
Consider designs 074, 078, and 0815. They certainly look like cheerleader uniforms. That is to say, they look like pictures of cheerleader uniforms, just like Van Gogh’s old shoes look like shoes. I do not see how one could see them otherwise....
Were I to accept the majority’s invitation to “imaginatively remov[e]” the chevrons and stripes as they are arranged on the neckline, waistline, sleeves, and skirt of each uniform, and apply them on a “painter’s canvas,” that painting would be of a cheerleader’s dress.... Hence, each design is not physically separate, nor is it conceptually separate, from the useful article it depicts, namely, a cheerleader’s dress. They cannot be copyrighted.
Thus articles Excerpt from the new Supreme Court opinion about the copyrightability of a cheerleader's uniforms.
that is all articles Excerpt from the new Supreme Court opinion about the copyrightability of a cheerleader's uniforms. This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Excerpt from the new Supreme Court opinion about the copyrightability of a cheerleader's uniforms. with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2017/03/excerpt-from-new-supreme-court-opinion.html
Related Posts :
"It’s easy to laugh at a grown man in a rubber dog suit chewing on a squeaky toy. Maybe too easy, in fact, because to laugh is to..."
One mate in the bright sunlight, another waiting in the... wings.- "What does a rat look like when he’s listening to himself being a rat in a room full of people who know he’s a rat..."?
- At the Sunday Night Café...
- "Supplements Won’t Prevent Dementia. But These Steps Might."
0 Response to "Excerpt from the new Supreme Court opinion about the copyrightability of a cheerleader's uniforms."
Post a Comment