Title : Did you watch that McCabe thing on "60 Minutes"?
link : Did you watch that McCabe thing on "60 Minutes"?
Did you watch that McCabe thing on "60 Minutes"?
I did. I watched it very closely. With some meticulous rewinding and analysis (where McCabe declared Trump "disgusting" and it was hard to understand exactly why (Trump, campaigning had weaponized a factoid from the Wall Street Journal)).I thought the "60 Minutes" presentation followed a clever narrative arc, with a beginning that allowed McCabe to inflate himself, a middle that brought in his wife and complicated the story, and an ending that gave us so much reason to doubt his credibility that I said out loud, "This really isn't favorable to McCabe at all."
At first, I thought the reasons to mistrust McCabe should have been presented up front, so we could question his telling of the story as we went along, but in the end, I liked the narrative arc, which I think is typical of "60 Minutes." We're drawn in, and then things are not what they seemed, and we're challenged. Then, suddenly, it's that ticking clock on the screen. That's all you get. Figure it out!
Here's the full interview, with video and transcript. I'll just excerpt the text of the part we rewound and rewatched about 10 times:
But in the closing days of the 2016 presidential campaign, The Wall Street Journal ran an article headlined "Clinton Ally Aided FBI Wife." It was about Jill McCabe's funding the year before. The article noted, accurately, that her husband's role in the Clinton email investigation began months after she lost. But candidate Donald Trump seemed to conflate the two.My question was: What lies? And: How did Trump manipulate them? We even paused on the text of the WSJ article so we could read it (the "Clinton Ally" was Terry McAuliffe).
President Trump at Rally: It was just learned that one of the closest people to Hillary Clinton with long-standing ties to her husband and herself… gave more than $675,000 to the campaign of the spouse, the wife, of the top FBI official who helped oversee the investigation into Mrs. Clinton's illegal email server.
Scott Pelley: How do you feel when you see that?
Jill McCabe: Sick. Sick to my stomach.
Andrew McCabe: I think sickening is the right word. It's disgusting. To see the candidate for the presidency taking those lies and manipulating them for his own advantage, and then to hear you know, the chants and the boos of thousands of people who are just accepting those lies at face value, it's chilling.
The best I came up with in answer to my question was that Jill McCabe received the $675,000 and lost her election before Andrew McCabe took on a role in the Hillary Clinton investigation, so when Clinton's ally gave the money to Jill, her husband was not yet in the position she had a huge interest having influence over. I don't think Andrew McCabe is saying the WSJ published lies, and the only "lies" I see in what Trump said is giving an impression about the time line.
I think Jill and Andrew are horrified at how effectively Trump weaponized the material. Of course, he used it "for his own advantage." Is that what Andrew McCabe is calling "manipulating"? Why isn't that just being a very effective candidate?
Thus articles Did you watch that McCabe thing on "60 Minutes"?
that is all articles Did you watch that McCabe thing on "60 Minutes"? This time, hopefully can provide benefits to all of you. Okay, see you in another article posting.
You now read the article Did you watch that McCabe thing on "60 Minutes"? with the link address https://usainnew.blogspot.com/2019/02/did-you-watch-that-mccabe-thing-on-60.html
0 Response to "Did you watch that McCabe thing on "60 Minutes"?"
Post a Comment